首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >New perspectives on risk communication: uncertainty in a complex society
【24h】

New perspectives on risk communication: uncertainty in a complex society

机译:风险沟通的新观点:复杂社会中的不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Risk communication is a point of intersection of social communication, practical management and policy-making. It covers such diverse activities as to inform and educate the public about risk, and risk management in order to influence attitudes and behaviour, to act in situations of emergency or crises, to aid in decision-making and to assist in conflict resolution. Communication has grown into a major concern in current risk governance based on network co-ordinated management of public affairs conducted by authorities and companies (Swyngedouw 2005) and is recognized as a key component in the government of risk (Hood, Rothstein, and Baldwin 2004). This is especially salient in policy fields relating to environmental planning and resource management, urban planning, chemical and food regulation, or infrastructure planning, development and maintenance. Polarization between the perceptions of lay publics on the one hand, and regulators, scientific experts and project proponents on the other has been a key issue in risk communication research (Petts and Brooks 2006). The field involves several distinctions, including that between expert and laymen, between those affected by decision and those who make the decisions, between conflict and co-operation, between facts and values, and between inclusion and exclusion in decision processes (for a recent overview of the field see Palencher and Heath 2007).
机译:风险沟通是社会沟通,实际管理和政策制定之间的交叉点。它涵盖了各种活动,例如,对公众进行风险宣传和教育,以及风险管理以影响态度和行为,在紧急情况或危机情况下采取行动,协助决策和协助解决冲突。基于当局和公司对公共事务的网络协调管理,沟通已成为当前风险治理的主要关注点(Swyngedouw 2005),并被公认为风险政府的关键组成部分(Hood,Rothstein和Baldwin 2004) )。这在与环境规划和资源管理,城市规划,化学和食品法规或基础设施规划,开发和维护有关的政策领域尤其突出。一方面,外行公众的看法与另一方面,监管者,科学专家和项目支持者之间的两极分化一直是风险交流研究中的关键问题(Petts and Brooks 2006)。该领域涉及多个区别,包括专家与非专业人士之间的区别,受决策影响的人与决策者之间的区别,冲突与合作之间,事实与价值之间的区别以及决策过程中的包含与排除之间的区别(有关最新概述)。有关领域,请参见Palencher and Heath 2007)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of risk research》 |2008年第2期|1-3|共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号