首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >Exploring risk attitude by a comparative experimental approach and its implication to disaster insurance practice in China
【24h】

Exploring risk attitude by a comparative experimental approach and its implication to disaster insurance practice in China

机译:比较实验方法探索风险态度及其对中国灾害保险实践的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study employs the ordered lottery selection approach with field experiment to measure risk attitude of two distinct population groups in China - farmers in Wuhan and freelancers in media and advertising in Beijing. A comparative design was used to reveal the cross-population difference in risk attitude and its affecting factors. The results showed that both groups exhibited constant partial risk aversion and decreasing absolute risk aversion, while the farmers were more risk-averse than the freelancers. The farmer and freelancer respondents demonstrated very different sensitivity to the warming-up games types involving 'gain-only' or 'gain-loss' while extremely risk-averse respondents in the warming-up games possessed the consistent attitudinal behavior in the formal tests. The comparative experiment revealed that gender and income were two statistically significant factors affecting risk attitude and they appeared to be consistent across the two distinct groups. Surprisingly, respondents' perceived frequency of risk occurrence was not correlated to their risk attitude. Moreover, the factors of leisure and investment behavior were significantly linked to the freelancers' risk attitude but not the farmers'. The experiment also found a non-linear relationship between risk attitude and education, and receiving college education was found to be a critical switching point that was significantly linked to respondents' risk choices. While further research is needed to better understand the governing mechanism in risk attitude, perception, and behavior, this paper tried to link the experimental results to the natural disaster insurance practice in China and discussed their implication to the policy design.
机译:本研究采用有序彩票选择方法和田间实验来衡量中国两个不同人群的风险态度,即武汉的农民和北京的媒体与广告自由职业者。通过比较设计揭示了不同人群在风险态度及其影响因素上的差异。结果表明,两组都表现出恒定的部分风险规避和绝对风险规避的降低,而农民比自由职业者更能规避风险。农民和自由职业者的受访者对包括“仅获得收益”或“收益损失”的热身游戏类型表现出截然不同的敏感性,而在热身游戏中极度规避风险的受访者在正式测试中具有一致的态度行为。对比实验表明,性别和收入是影响风险态度的两个统计学上显着的因素,并且在两个不同的群体中它们似乎是一致的。令人惊讶的是,受访者对风险发生频率的感知与他们的风险态度无关。此外,休闲和投资行为的因素与自由职业者的风险态度显着相关,而与农民的风险态度无关。该实验还发现风险态度与教育之间存在非线性关系,而接受大学教育是与受访者的风险选择显着相关的关键转换点。尽管需要进一步研究以更好地理解风险态度,感知和行为的治理机制,但本文尝试将实验结果与中国的自然灾害保险实践联系起来,并讨论了它们对政策设计的意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of risk research》 |2013年第8期|861-878|共18页
  • 作者

    Tao Ye; Ming Wang;

  • 作者单位

    State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resources Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resources Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    risk attitude; comparative experiment; disaster insurance; China;

    机译:风险态度;比较实验灾害保险;中国;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号