首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >The participatory turn in radioactive waste management: deliberation and the social-technical divide
【24h】

The participatory turn in radioactive waste management: deliberation and the social-technical divide

机译:放射性废物管理的参与性转变:审议与社会技术鸿沟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

National policies for long-term management of radioactive waste have for decades been driven by technical experts. The pursuit of these technocratic policies led in many countries to conflict with affected communities. Since the late 1990s, however, there has been a turn to more participatory approaches. This participatory turn reflects widespread acknowledgement in the discourse of policy actors and implementing organisations of the importance of social aspects of radioactive waste management (RWM) and the need to involve citizens and their representatives in the process. This appears to be an important move towards democratisation of this particular field of technological decision-making but, despite these developments, technical aspects are still most often brought into the public arena only after technical experts have defined the 'problem' and decided upon a 'solution'. This maintains a notional divide between the treatment of technical and social aspects of RWM and raises pressing questions about the kind of choice affected communities are given if they are not able to debate fully the technical options. The article aims to contribute to better understanding and addressing this situation by exploring the complex entanglement of the social and the technical in RWM policy and practice, analysing the contingent configurations that emerge as sociotechnical combinations. Drawing upon empirical examples from four countries that, have taken the participatory turn -Belgium, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom - the article describes the different ways in which sociotechnical combinations have been constructed, and discusses their implications for future practice.
机译:数十年来,放射性废物长期管理的国家政策一直是由技术专家制定的。对这些技术官僚政策的追求导致许多国家与受影响社区发生冲突。但是,自1990年代后期以来,已经转向了更具参与性的方法。这种参与性转变反映了在政策参与者和实施组织的讨论中,人们普遍认识到放射性废物管理(RWM)的社会方面的重要性以及在此过程中需要让公民及其代表参与进来。这似乎是朝着这个特定的技术决策领域民主化迈出的重要一步,但是尽管有这些进展,但只有在技术专家定义了“问题”并决定了“问题”之后,技术方面仍常常被带入公共领域。解'。这在RWM的技术和社会方面之间保持了理论上的鸿沟,并提出了一个迫切的问题,即如果社区无法对技术选择进行充分辩论,则会对选择社区产生何种选择。本文旨在探索RWM政策和实践中社会和技术的复杂纠缠,分析以社会技术组合形式出现的或有配置,从而有助于更好地理解和解决这种情况。借鉴比利时,斯洛文尼亚,瑞典和英国这四个参与性转向的国家的经验示例,本文介绍了构建社会技术组合的不同方式,并讨论了它们对未来实践的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号