...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Regional Science >Community Cohesion in Crisis? New Dimensions of Diversity and Difference
【24h】

Community Cohesion in Crisis? New Dimensions of Diversity and Difference

机译:危机中的社区凝聚力?多样性与差异的新维度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Academic writings and government policies on "community cohesion" are prolific. These documents have tended to emerge in response to discourses of loss, fragmentation, and disengagement that are often attributed to globalization, neoliberalism, and consumerism. The theme of Flint and Robinson's book, as the title implies, is no different. The research reported in the book reflects upon the "street disturbances" in northern parts of England in 2001 and subsequent events such as the later bomb attacks in London. The British Government responded by producing policies on "community cohesion" with the aim to normalize behavior in accordance with accepted standards of "Britishness," national identity, and citizenship. This "commonness" is supposed to produce trust and familiarity between disparate groups and thereby reduce the risks attached to civil unrest and "deviant" behaviors. The community cohesion policies of the Government mark the site of "community" as being both the problem and the solution.
机译:关于“社区凝聚力”的学术著作和政府政策是多产的。这些文件的出现往往是针对通常归因于全球化,新自由主义和消费主义的损失,分裂和脱离接触的论述。顾名思义,弗林特和鲁滨逊的书的主题没有什么不同。该书中报道的研究反映了2001年英格兰北部的“街头骚乱”以及随后发生的事件,例如后来伦敦发生的炸弹袭击。英国政府的回应是制定了“社区凝聚力”政策,旨在根据公认的“英国”,国民身份和公民身份标准规范行为。这种“共同性”应该在不同群体之间产生信任和熟悉,从而减少内乱和“越轨”行为带来的风险。政府的社区凝聚政策标志着“社区”既是问题也是解决方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Regional Science》 |2010年第4期|p.893-894|共2页
  • 作者

    Caryl Bosman;

  • 作者单位

    Urban Research Program Griffith University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号