...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management >Supply chain finance schemes in the procurement of agricultural products
【24h】

Supply chain finance schemes in the procurement of agricultural products

机译:农产品采购中的供应链融资计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Product, information, and finance flows are all interrelated within the modern supply chain; thus, it is now more than ever of paramount importance for practitioners to integrate procurement and financial decisions. This challenge is exemplified in many agricultural supply chains, where operational risks are significant and access to capital differs sharply across firms. We study three management tactics that some large food/beverage manufacturers - situated downstream in these chains - have used to meet the challenge: ordinary fixed price contracts (or soft tolling) with direct suppliers, hard tolling and contract farming where the manufacturer intervenes upstream, providing capital, and coordinating procurement decisions. We place these upstream intervention schemes in the theoretical context of supply chain finance (SCF) and model their application to a three-echelon agricultural supply chain. We perform a numerical study in order to understand how the structure of capital constraints in the chain may influence the manufacturer's choice of SCF scheme. The numerical study is based on a business case that reflects the barley-malt supply chain of Heineken N.V. Despite greater coordination opportunities, we show that upstream intervention is not necessarily preferable for the manufacturer. Nevertheless, the preferred SCF scheme can be inferred on the basis of relatively simple characterization of the capital constraints in the supply chain.
机译:产品,信息和资金流在现代供应链中都是相互关联的。因此,从业人员现在比以往任何时候都更重要的是整合采购和财务决策。在许多农业供应链中都体现了这一挑战,在这些农业供应链中,操作风险很大,而且各公司之间获得资本的方式也大不相同。我们研究了一些大型食品/饮料制造商(位于这些链条的下游)用来应对挑战的三种管理策略:与直接供应商的普通固定价格合同(或低价收费),硬收费和在其上游进行干预的合同农业,提供资金,并协调采购决策。我们将这些上游干预计划置于供应链金融(SCF)的理论背景下,并对其在三级农业供应链中的应用进行建模。我们进行了数值研究,以了解链中资本约束的结构如何影响制造商对SCF方案的选择。数值研究基于一个商业案例,该案例反映了喜力啤酒大麦芽的供应链。尽管有更多的协调机会,但我们表明上游干预不一定对制造商有利。然而,可以基于供应链中资本约束的相对简单特征来推断出首选SCF方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management》 |2019年第2期|172-184|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Capital Chains, Wilgenstr 13, NL-5271 JH St Michielsgestel, Netherlands;

    Windesheim Univ Appl Sci, Strateg Entrepreneurship Res Ctr, Campus 2-6, NL-8017 CA Zwolle, Netherlands;

    Drexel Univ, LeBow Coll Business, 3220 Market Str, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA;

    Windesheim Univ Appl Sci, Strateg Entrepreneurship Res Ctr, Campus 2-6, NL-8017 CA Zwolle, Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号