首页> 外文期刊>Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht >A Kelsenian model of constitutional adjudication The Austrian Constitutional Court
【24h】

A Kelsenian model of constitutional adjudication The Austrian Constitutional Court

机译:凯尔森式的宪法裁决模型奥地利宪法法院

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For more than hundred years the “American system” of adjudication, mastered by one Supreme Court vested with the power to review not only judicial, but also administrative as well as legislative acts enjoyed the virtual monopoly to serve as the role-model of Constitutional review. When the Austrian Constitution was enacted in 1920, however, it was supplemented by an “Austrian system” of adjudication essentially designed byHans Kelsen; creating a specialized body to review the constitutionality of legislative acts; the first Constitutional Court. This article provides an introduction to the Court’s organization and proceedings.
机译:一百多年来,由一个最高法院掌握的“美国审判系统”不仅具有司法权,而且具有行政权和立法法的审查权,实际上享有垄断地位,可以作为宪法审查的榜样。 。然而,当1920年颁布《奥地利宪法》时,由汉斯·凯尔森(Hans Kelsen)设计的“奥地利制”审判制度对其进行了补充。建立一个专门机构,审查立法行为的合宪性;第一宪法法院。本文介绍了法院的组织和诉讼程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号