...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public economics >Does front-loading taxation increase savings? Evidence from Roth 401(k) introductions
【24h】

Does front-loading taxation increase savings? Evidence from Roth 401(k) introductions

机译:前期税收会增加储蓄吗?罗斯401(k)引言的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Can governments increase private savings by taxing savings up front instead of in retirement? Roth 401(k) contributions are not tax-deductible in the contribution year, but withdrawals in retirement are untaxed. The more common before-tax 401(k) contribution is tax-deductible in the contribution year, but both principal and investment earnings are taxed upon withdrawal. Using administrative data from eleven companies that added a Roth contribution option to their existing 401(k) plan between 2006 and 2010, we find no evidence that total 401(k) contribution rates differ between employees hired before versus after Roth introduction, which implies that take-home pay declines and the amount of retirement consumption being purchased by 401(k) contributions increases after Roth introduction. We reject several neoclassical explanations for our null finding. Results from a survey experiment suggest two behavioral explanations: (1) employee confusion about and neglect of the tax properties of Roth balances and (2) partition dependence. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:政府是否可以通过对储蓄征税而不是退休来增加私人储蓄?罗斯401(k)缴款在缴款年度不可抵税,但退休时的提款无需缴税。较常见的税前401(k)缴款在缴款年度可抵扣税款,但本金和投资收益均在提取时征税。使用2006年至2010年之间向其现有401(k)计划添加Roth缴款选项的11家公司的管理数据,我们发现没有证据表明在引入Roth之前和之后雇用的雇员之间总401(k)缴款率有所不同,这意味着罗斯引入后,实得薪水下降,而401(k)供款购买的退休消费量增加。对于我们的无效发现,我们拒绝一些新古典主义的解释。一项调查实验的结果提出了两种行为上的解释:(1)员工对罗斯余额的税收性质感到困惑和忽视,以及(2)分区依赖性。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号