首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Property Investment & Finance >Reasons For Implementing Public Private Partnership Projects: Perspectives From Hong Kong, Australian And British Practitioners
【24h】

Reasons For Implementing Public Private Partnership Projects: Perspectives From Hong Kong, Australian And British Practitioners

机译:实施公私合营项目的原因:香港,澳大利亚和英国从业者的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper sets out to present the findings of a study to investigate the reasons for implementing Public Private Partnership (PPP) projects. Design/methodology/approach - A questionnaire survey was conducted in Hong Kong (also commonly referred to as the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region), Australia and the United Kingdom. The survey respondents were asked to rate the importance of nine identified reasons for implementing PPP projects. Findings - The findings of the top three ranks for each respondent group were investigated. Ranked top by the survey respondents in Hong Kong was "Private incentive". Ranked second by all three groups of survey respondents was "Economic development pressure demanding more facilities". Third in Hong Kong and first in Australia was "High quality of service required". The reason "Inefficiency because of public monopoly and lack of competition" was ranked third by the Australian respondents. And finally ranked first and third by the British respondents was "Shortage of government funding" and "Avoid public investment restriction". The rankings showed that in general those rated highly in the United Kingdom focused on financial elements whereas those rated highly in Hong Kong and Australia were more related to the overall performance of improving public projects. Originality/value - These findings were believed to provide an idea of the possible reasons for implementing PPP projects, and as a result illustrate a clearer understanding of the process.
机译:目的-本文着手介绍一项研究结果,以调查实施公私合营(PPP)项目的原因。设计/方法/方法-在香港(通常也称为香港特别行政区),澳大利亚和英国进行了问卷调查。调查受访者被要求对实施PPP项目的九个确定原因的重要性进行评级。调查结果-调查了每个受访者组的前三名的调查结果。在香港的调查受访者中,“私人奖励”排名最高。在所有三组调查受访者中排名第二的是“需要更多设施的经济发展压力”。 “要求高质量的服务”在香港排名第三,在澳大利亚排名第一。澳大利亚受访者将“公共垄断和缺乏竞争导致效率低下”的原因排在第三位。最后,在英国受访者中排名第一和第三的是“政府资助的数量”和“避免公共投资的限制”。排名显示,总体上,在英国获得较高评价的企业侧重于财务要素,而在香港和澳大利亚获得较高评价的企业则与改善公共项目的整体绩效更为相关。原创性/价值-这些发现被认为提供了实施PPP项目的可能原因的想法,从而说明了对该过程的更清晰的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号