...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Civil Engineering and Management >THE PUBLIC SECTOR'S PERSPECTIVE ON PROCURING PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS - COMPARING THE VIEWS OF PRACTITIONERS IN HONG KONG AND AUSTRALIA
【24h】

THE PUBLIC SECTOR'S PERSPECTIVE ON PROCURING PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS - COMPARING THE VIEWS OF PRACTITIONERS IN HONG KONG AND AUSTRALIA

机译:公共部门对采购公共工程项目的看法-比较香港和澳大利亚从业人员的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Honkongas vienas pirm?j? ?dieg? vie?ojo ir privataus sektoriaus partneryst?s model? vykdant stambius visuomeninius infrastruktūros projektus. Jo pl?tra Honkonge buvo sud?tinga. Yra gana daug sri?i?, kurias būt? ?domu aptarti. Kaip sud?tinio vie?ojo ir privataus sektoriaus partneryst?s ?gyvendinimo tyrimo dalis atlikta vietini? pramoninink? i? vie?ojo sektoriaus apklausa d?l vie??j? darb? pirkim? perspektyv?. Tarp apklaust?j? buvo keturiolika vyriausyb?s pareigūn? ir patar?j?. Apklausos rezultatai parod?, kad daugelis respondent? i? Honkongo ir Australijos yra anks?iau atlik? tyrimus vie?ojo bei privataus sektoriaus partneryst?s srityje. Abi respondent? grup?s sutiko, kad vie?ojo ir privataus sektoriaus bendradarbiavimo projektai yra prana?esni efektyvumu, kompetencija ir valdymo geb?jimais, lyginant su tradiciniais projektais. Taip pat abi respondent? grup?s nurod?, kad vie?ojo ir privataus sektoriaus partneryst? labiau tinka verslo ekonomini? projekt? atveju. Respondentai mano, kad svarbiausias vie?ojo ir privataus sektoriaus partneryst?s projektams yra rangovus apibūdinantis rodiklis. Respondentai i?skyr? daug vie?ojo ir privataus sektoriaus partneryst?s projekt? kritini? s?km?s veiksni?. Du i? j? yra bendri abiem apklaust?j? grup?ms. Tai gerai apibr??ti projekto tikslai ir bendradarbiavimo dvasia, ?sipareigojimai, tarpusavio pasitik?jimas. Galiausiai nustatyta, kad vidaus valdymas yra paprastesnis Australijos apklaustose organizacijose, lyginant su Honkongo respondentais. ?iame straipsnyje nagrin?jamas vie?ojo sektoriaus po?iūris ? vie?ojo ir privataus sektoriaus partneryst? Honkonge ir Australijoje. Tyrimas gali pad?ti atsakyti ? klausimus, kylan?ius tiek akademiniame, tiek priva?iame sektoriuje. Tad privatus sektorius gali geriau pasiruo?ti deryboms su vie?uoju sektoriumi, geriau suprasti j? poreikius. Moksliniam sektoriui suteikiamos platesn?s ?ios srities tyrim? perspektyvos.%Hong Kong has been one of the early jurisdictions to adopt Public Private Partnership (PPP) model for delivering large public infrastructure projects. The development of this procurement approach in Hong Kong has followed an intricate path. As such, it is believed that there are a number of areas which are interesting to unveil. As part of a comprehensive research study looking at implementing PPPs, interviews with experienced local industrial practitioners from the public sector were conducted to realize their perspective on the topic of procuring public works projects. Amongst these interviews, fourteen were launched government officials and advisers. The interview findings show that the majority of the Hong Kong and Australian interviewees had previously conducted some kind of research in the field of PPP. Both groups of interviewees agreed that "PPPs gain private sector's added efficiency/expertise/management skills" when compared to projects procured traditionally. Also, both groups of interviewees felt that projects best suited to use PPP are those that have an "Economic business case". The interviewees believed that "Contractor's performance" could be used as key performance indicators for PPP projects. A large number of critical success factors were identified by the interviewees for PPP projects; two of these were similar for both groups of interviewees. These included "Project objectives well defined" and "Partnership spirit/commitment/trust". Finally it was found that in-house guidance materials were more common in the organizations of the Australian interviewees compared to the Hong Kong ones. This paper studies the views of the public sector towards the topic of PPPs in Hong Kong and Australia, which helps to answer some of the queries that both academics and the private sector in these jurisdictions are keen to know. As a result the private sector can be more prepared when negotiating with the public sector and realise their needs better, academics on the other hand are provided a wider perspective of this topic benefiting the research industry at large.
机译:香港是第一个die?公私伙伴关系模型。大型公共基础设施项目。它在香港的发展一直很困难。这里有很多地方?讨论的想法。作为实施公私合营伙伴关系研究的一部分,地方实业家?一世?公共部门公共部门调查工作?我们会买吗?观点?在受访者中是十四位政府官员。和顾问。调查结果表明,有很多受访者?一世?香港和澳大利亚此前曾演出过。公私伙伴关系领域的研究。两位受访者?小组一致认为,在效率,能力和管理技能方面,公私伙伴关系要优于传统项目。还是两个受访者?团体表示,公私伙伴关系更适合商业经济学?项目?案件。受访者认为,描述承包​​商的指标对于PPP项目最为重要。受访者单挑有很多公私合作项目?危急?成功因素。杜我? ??对两个受访者来说都是共同的。组吗?这是一个明确的项目目标,本着合作,承诺,互信的精神。最后,在澳大利亚进行调查的组织中,与香港受访者相比,内部管理更为简单。本文探讨了公共部门的观点。公私伙伴关系?在香港和澳大利亚。研究可以帮助回答这个问题吗?在学术界和私营部门都出现的问题。因此,私营部门可以更好地准备与公共部门进行谈判,更好地了解它。需要。在这一领域,科学界得到了更广泛的研究。展望。%香港是采用公私合营(PPP)模式交付大型公共基础设施项目的较早司法管辖区之一。在香港,这种采购方式的发展遵循着复杂的道路。因此,据信有许多有趣的领域。作为一项针对实施PPP的全面研究的一部分,对公共部门经验丰富的本地工业从业人员进行了采访,以了解他们对采购公共工程项目的看法。在这些采访中,有十四位是政府官员和顾问。访谈结果表明,大多数香港和澳大利亚受访者以前在PPP领域进行过某种研究。两组受访者都认为,与传统采购的项目相比,“公私合作提高了私营部门的效率/专业知识/管理技能”。此外,两组受访者都认为最适合使用PPP的项目是那些具有“经济业务案例”的项目。受访者认为,“承包商的绩效”可以用作PPP项目的关键绩效指标。受访者确定了PPP项目的许多关键成功因素;对于两组受访者而言,其中两个是相似的。其中包括“明确定义的项目目标”和“合作精神/承诺/信任”。最后,发现内部指导材料在澳大利亚受访者组织中比在香港更常见。本文研究了香港和澳大利亚公共部门对PPP的观点,这有助于回答这些司法管辖区的学者和私营部门都渴望知道的一些疑问。结果,私营部门在与公共部门进行谈判时可以做更多的准备,并更好地了解他们的需求,另一方面,学者们正在就这一主题提供更广阔的前景,从而使整个研究行业受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号