There remains an active debate as to whether asset allocation or security selection is more important in investment performance. This revisit of the question uses a normative framework suggested before, but adds a more representative opportunity set for asset allocation, an unbiased dataset for stocks, and a modified security selection methodology that ensures strict uniformity with asset allocation rebalancing rules. In this case, the results do not support a clear hierarchy of investment choice. The extent to which asset allocation or security selection generates dispersion in active return is largely time-dependent.
展开▼
