首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Political Ideologies >Liberal dilemmas and the concept of politics
【24h】

Liberal dilemmas and the concept of politics

机译:自由主义困境与政治概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since the 1980s liberal political theorists have become increasingly interested in the concepts of politics and the political. This raises interesting questions about the role played by the concept of politics in contemporary liberal ideologies, why so many professional liberal theorists have now become interested in the concept of politics, and how they understand this concept. I concentrate on the work of Rawls, Honig and Connolly and argue that despite coming from different ideological backgrounds, these theorists share a surprisingly similar understanding of politics as a concept that can be opposed both to force and philosophy. Exploration of the reasons why they adopt this peculiar understanding of politics reveals some of the questions and assumptions that structure contemporary liberal academic discourse and distinguish it from earlier liberal ideologies.
机译:自1980年代以来,自由派政治理论家对政治和政治概念越来越感兴趣。这引起了有关政治概念在当代自由主义意识形态中所起的作用的有趣问题,为什么现在有这么多专业的自由派理论家对政治概念产生兴趣,以及他们如何理解这一概念。我将重点放在罗尔斯,霍尼格和康诺利的著作上,并认为尽管这些理论家来自不同的意识形态背景,但他们对政治这一可以同时反对武力和哲学的概念有着惊人的相似理解。对他们为什么采用这种对政治的特殊理解的原因的探索揭示了构成当代自由主义学术话语并将其与早期的自由主义意识形态区分开的一些问题和假设。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Political Ideologies》 |2008年第3期|297-320|共24页
  • 作者

    Julia Skorupska;

  • 作者单位

    St. Hugh's College, Oxford, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:40

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号