...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >R. (on the application of Powell) v Brighton Marina Co Ltd
【24h】

R. (on the application of Powell) v Brighton Marina Co Ltd

机译:R.(在Powell的申请下)v Brighton Marina Co Ltd

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The claimant local resident (P) sought the quashing of a decision of the third defendant Marine Management Organisation (M) to grant consent under the Brighton Marina Act 1968 s.24 to permit development at the marina. He also sought an order prohibiting the first and second defendants (B and W) from proceeding with the works which they had commenced. The 1968 Act authorised B to construct a marina, with recreational and residential facilities, and to reclaim land from the sea for that purpose. Section 23 of the Act required B to complete the works by October 1, 1979. In 2006, planning permission was granted for a residential-led mixed use development at the marina, comprising 11 buildings which were proposed to be constructed on a deck above the existing beach. In December 2013, M granted consent under s.24 for the construction of an engineered basement below the deck to house a car park. B and W promptly began piling works. P submitted that what was being constructed was structurally distinct from the works authorised under s.5 of the Act; it was not an extension or alteration of the existing works. He argued that the power to "make" under s.5 was subject to the time limit for completion of the works, namely October 1, 1979. He submitted, alternatively, that even if part of the current work comprised extending the pier or breakwater, that was ancillary to the main purpose, which was development within s.40.
机译:索赔人当地居民(P)寻求第三被告海洋管理组织(M)的一项决定的撤销,该决定同意根据1968年布赖顿码头法令第24条给予同意,以允许在码头进行开发。他还寻求一项命令,禁止第一被告和第二被告(B和W)继续进行他们已经开始的工作。 1968年法令授权B建造一个带有娱乐和住宅设施的码头,并为此目的从海上开垦土地。该法令第23条要求B在1979年10月1日之前完成工程。2006年,规划许可获得了滨海住宅主导的混合用途开发项目的批准,该开发项目包括11栋拟建在码头上方甲板上的建筑物。现有的海滩。 2013年12月,M根据第24条授予了同意,在甲板下方建造一个可容纳停车场的工程地下室。 B和W立即开始打桩工程。 P认为,所建造的建筑在结构上与该法第5条所授权的工程有所不同;这不是对现有作品的扩展或改动。他辩称,根据第5条进行“制造”的权力受制于工程完成的时限,即1979年10月1日。他提出,或者,即使当前工程的一部分包括扩建码头或防波堤, ,这是辅助主要目的的,即在第40条之内进行开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号