...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of planning education and research >Commentary: Is Urban Design Still Urban Planning? An Exploration and Response
【24h】

Commentary: Is Urban Design Still Urban Planning? An Exploration and Response

机译:评论:城市设计仍是城市规划吗?探索与回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article considers the factors contributing to the recent international trend for a differentiation between planning and urban design. It considers these highly related fields from the perspective of neoliberalism, global competition, and the doxa of New Urbanism. The article argues that urban design needs to be retained as an important subset of planning practice, concerned with the physical design of cities, so that the core planning values of serving the public interest in the attainment of social equity, democratic civil society, and an ecologically sustainable future may be maintained in our city-building processes.
机译:本文考虑了导致近期国际趋势导致规划与城市设计之间差异的因素。它从新自由主义,全球竞争和新都市主义的多角性的角度考虑了这些高度相关的领域。文章认为,城市设计应保留为规划实践的一个重要子集,涉及城市的物理设计,以便在实现社会公平,民主公民社会和实现公共利益方面为公共利益服务的核心规划价值。在我们的城市建设过程中,可以维持生态上可持续的未来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号