首页> 外文期刊>Journal of place management and development >Participatory planning in Israel: from theory to practice
【24h】

Participatory planning in Israel: from theory to practice

机译:以色列的参与式计划:从理论到实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the gap between the declarations regarding participatory planning and its actual implementation in practice within the Israeli spatial planning context. Design/methodology/approach: The paper explores the gap between theory of participatory spatial planning and its implementation in practice by a comparative analysis of three participatory case studies in the Israeli planning context. The data collected to analyze the case studies is secondary data, including previous research on the three case studies and their re-evaluation on the basis of indicators for participation. Findings: Participatory spatial planning processes are not often implemented in the Israeli context, as they are not required by law. All the three case studies explored in this paper deal with local spatial plans at the neighborhood level, but each expresses a very different participation mode: one is a national, government-led program; the second is a residents-led opposition to a municipal plan; and the third is a third-sector initiative offering an alternative plan to an existing one. The findings suggest that there is a correlation between the initiating body, its commitment to participation and the level of success of the participatory process. Research limitations/implications: This paper focuses on three specific participatory spatial planning projects in Israel. Further exploration of additional participatory projects may prove useful to verify or refute the conclusions reached in this paper. Originality/value: There is very little exploration and evaluation of participatory spatial planning processes in Israel. This paper provides a valuable, although limited, analysis, linking participatory planning theory to practice within the Israeli context.
机译:目的:本文旨在调查有关参与式规划的声明与以色列空间规划背景下的实际实施之间的差距。设计/方法/方法:本文通过对以色列规划背景下的三个参与性案例研究进行比较分析,探索了参与性空间规划理论与实际实施之间的差距。收集用于分析案例研究的数据是辅助数据,包括先前对这三个案例研究的研究,并根据参与指标对它们进行了重新评估。调查结果:参与性空间规划过程通常不在以色列范围内实施,因为法律并没有要求这样做。本文探讨的所有三个案例研究都涉及到社区层面的局部空间规划,但是每个案例都表达了一种截然不同的参与模式:一个是国家政府主导的计划;另一个是政府主导的计划。第二个是居民主导的反对市政计划;第三是第三部门倡议,为现有计划提供了替代计划。研究结果表明,发起机构,其对参与的承诺与参与过程的成功水平之间存在相关性。研究的局限性/意义:本文重点介绍以色列的三个具体的参与性空间规划项目。进一步探索其他参与性项目可能对验证或反驳本文得出的结论很有用。原创性/价值:以色列很少参与性空间规划过程的探索和评估。本文提供了有价值的(尽管有限的)分析,将参与式计划理论与以色列环境下的实践联系起来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号