首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Philosophical Logic >Modality, Quantification, and Many Vlach-Operators
【24h】

Modality, Quantification, and Many Vlach-Operators

机译:模态,量化和许多Vlach运算符

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Consider two standard quantified modal languages and whose vocabularies comprise the identity predicate and the existence predicate, each endowed with a standard S5 Kripke semantics where the models have a distinguished actual world, which differ only in that the quantifiers of are actualist while those of are possibilist. Is it possible to enrich these languages in the same manner, in a non-trivial way, so that the two resulting languages are equally expressive—i.e., so that for each sentence of one language there is a sentence of the other language such that given any model, the former sentence is true at the actual world of the model iff the latter is? Forbes (1989) shows that this can be done by adding to both languages a pair of sentential operators called Vlach-operators, and imposing a syntactic restriction on their occurrences in formulas. As Forbes himself recognizes, this restriction is somewhat artificial. The first result I establish in this paper is that one gets sameness of expressivity by introducing infinitely many distinct pairs of indexed Vlach-operators. I then study the effect of adding to our enriched modal languages a rigid actuality operator. Finally, I discuss another means of enriching both languages which makes them expressively equivalent, one that exploits devices introduced in Peacocke (1978). Forbes himself mentions that option but does not prove that the resulting languages are equally expressive. I do, and I also compare the Peacockian and the Vlachian methods. In due course, I introduce an alternative notion of expressivity and I compare the Peacockian and the Vlachian languages in terms of that other notion.
机译:考虑两种标准的量化模态语言,它们的词汇包括身份谓词和存在谓词,每种语言都具有标准的S5 Kripke语义,其中模型具有独特的实际世界,其不同之处仅在于的量词是实际的,而量词的是可能的。 。是否有可能以一种不平凡的方式以相同的方式丰富这些语言,从而使两种最终的语言具有同等的表现力,即,对于一种语言的每个句子,都有另一种语言的句子,使得任何模型,前者在模型的实际世界中是正确的,而后者是吗? 《福布斯》(Forbes,1989)表明,可以通过在两种语言中添加一对称为Vlach-operators的语句运算符,并对它们在公式中的出现施加句法限制来实现。正如福布斯本人承认的那样,这种限制有些人为。我在本文中建立的第一个结果是,通过引入无数对不同的索引Vlach运算符对,可以实现表达的相同性。然后,我研究了在刚性模态运算符中添加丰富的模态语言的效果。最后,我讨论了另一种丰富两种语言的方法,使它们在表达上等效,这是一种利用Peacocke(1978)引入的设备的方法。福布斯本人提到了这种选择,但并未证明所产生的语言具有同等的表达力。我做到了,而且我还比较了孔雀方法和弗拉奇方法。在适当的时候,我介绍了一种表达性的概念,并根据另一种概念比较了孔雀语言和弗拉奇语。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号