首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Personality Assessment >Measuring Mental Toughness in Sport: A Psychometric Examination of the Psychological Performance Inventory-A and Its Predecessor
【24h】

Measuring Mental Toughness in Sport: A Psychometric Examination of the Psychological Performance Inventory-A and Its Predecessor

机译:测量运动中的心理韧性:心理表现量表-A及其前身的心理测验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Touted as a multidimensional measure of mental toughness in sport, this study explored the psychometric properties of the Psychological Performance Inventory (PPI; Loehr, 198636. Loehr, J. E. 1986. Mental toughness training for sports: Achieving athletic excellence., Lexington, MA: Stephen Greene. View all references) and its successor the Psychological Performance Inventory-A (PPI-A; Golby, Sheard, & Van Wersch, 200720. Golby, J., Sheard, M. and Van Wersch, A. 2007. Evaluating the factor structure of the psychological performance inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills,, 105: 309-325. [CrossRef], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]View all references). Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to examine the extent to which data collected with 333 Australian footballers aged between 15 and 18 years (M = 16.88, SD = .71) fitted the a priori measurement models of both inventories. The results did not support the psychometric properties of the PPI both in terms of model fit and internal consistency. Although model fit data for the PPI-A were encouraging, inadequate levels of internal consistency were evidenced. Convergent validity analyses involving measures of achievement goals and global mental toughness generally supported the validity of the PPI and PPI-A subscales. Taken together with previous research (e.g., Middleton et al., 200439. Middleton, S. C., Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., Richards, G. E., Savis, J., Perry, C. and Brown, R. 2004. The psychological performance inventory: Is the mental toughness test tough enough?. International Journal of Sport Psychology,, 35: 91-108. [Web of Science ®]View all references), caution is urged when considering the use of the PPI as a measure of mental toughness in sport. Although the empirical data were generally supportive of the psychometric properties of the PPI-A, conceptual (e.g., lack of conceptual underpinnings) and methodological (i.e., revalidated a flawed inventory) concerns become important factors when considering the PPI-A as a measure of mental toughness.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.660292
机译:被吹捧为运动中心理韧性的多维量度,这项研究探索了心理绩效量表(PPI; Loehr,198636。Loehr,JE1986。运动的心理韧性训练:实现运动卓越)的心理计量学特性。,马萨诸塞州列克星敦市Greene。查看所有参考文献)及其后继者“心理绩效量表-A”(PPI-A; Golby,Sheard和Van Wersch,200720; Golby,J.,Sheard,M。和Van Wersch,A。2007。评估因素心理绩效量表的结构。感知和运动技能,105:309-325。[CrossRef],[PubMed],[Web of Science®]查看所有参考文献)。验证性因子分析用于检查收集的333名年龄在15至18岁(M = 16.88,SD = 0.71)的澳大利亚足球运动员的数据符合两个清单的先验测量模型的程度。在模型拟合和内部一致性方面,结果均不支持PPI的心理计量学特性。尽管PPI-A的模型拟合数据令人鼓舞,但内部一致性水平不足。涉及效绩目标和整体心理韧性的收敛效度分析通常支持PPI和PPI-A分量表的有效性。与先前的研究(例如,Middleton等人,200439。Middleton,SC,Marsh,HW,Martin,AJ,Richards,GE,Savis,J.,Perry,C. and Brown,R. 2004)一起。心理表现清单:心理韧性测试是否足够坚韧?国际体育心理学杂志,第35期:91-108。[Web of Science®]查看所有参考文献),在考虑将PPI用作心理指标时应谨慎行事。运动中的韧性。尽管经验数据通常支持PPI-A的心理计量学特性,但在考虑将PPI-A用作衡量PPI-A的指标时,概念性(例如,缺乏概念基础)和方法论(即,重新验证有缺陷的清单)的关注成为重要因素。心理韧性。查看全文下载全文相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citlikelike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid: ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.660292

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号