...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pension economics and finance >The payout stage in Chile: who annuitizes and why?
【24h】

The payout stage in Chile: who annuitizes and why?

机译:智利的付款阶段:谁年金,为什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 1981 Chile adopted its new multi-pillar system, which featured privately managed individual accounts. Starting in 1983 payouts from the accounts were permitted and detailed rules about payouts were put in place. The Chilean scheme therefore gives us an opportunity to examine how pensioners and pension providers react when individual accounts replace DB systems, and how detailed regulations shape these reactions. Retirees in Chile have a choice between early versus normal retirement (before or after age 65M/60W) and between annuitization versus programmed withdrawals; lump sum withdrawals are largely ruled out. Almost two-thirds of all retirees have annuitized - a very high proportion compared with other countries. This paper argues that this high rate of annuitization is the result of guarantees and regulations that constrain payout choices, insure retirees through the minimum pension guarantee, eliminate other DB components, and give a competitive advantage to insurance companies selling annuities. The minimum pension financed by the government provides insurance to workers with small accumulations, who retire at the normal age with programmed withdrawals, while those with large accumulations retire early and must purchase annuities to acquire longevity and investment insurance. Insurance companies further induce annuitization by marketing aggressively, facilitating early retirement for those who annuitize and offering a high money's worth ratio for price-indexed annuities. We find evidence of adverse selection based on asymmetric information about short-run health status, but this does not seem to deter the high rate of annuitization.
机译:1981年,智利采用了新的多支柱系统,该系统具有私人管理的个人帐户。从1983年开始,允许从帐户中付款,并制定了有关付款的详细规则。因此,智利计划为我们提供了一个机会,可以检查当个人帐户替换数据库系统时养老金领取者和养老金提供者的反应,以及详细的法规如何影响这些反应。智利的退休人员可以选择提前退休还是正常退休(65M / 60W年龄之前或之后),以及在年金化和计划性提款之间进行选择。基本上没有一次性提款。所有退休人员中几乎有三分之二已退休,与其他国家相比,这一比例非常高。本文认为,如此高的年金率是保证和法规的结果,这些保证和法规限制了支出选择,通过最低退休金保证向退休人员提供保险,消除了其他DB部分,并为销售年金的保险公司提供了竞争优势。由政府资助的最低退休金为那些积蓄很少的工人提供保险,这些工人在正常年龄退休并有计划的退休,而积蓄很多的工人则提前退休,必须购买年金才能获得长寿和投资保险。保险公司通过积极营销进一步诱使年金化,从而为那些年金化的人提供了提前退休的机会,并为价格指数年金提供了很高的货币价值比率。我们基于短期健康状况的不对称信息发现了不利选择的证据,但这似乎并不能阻止高额的年金化率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号