首页> 外文期刊>Journal of organizational change management >'Inertia Creeps', or a phenomenological perspective on objects in sociology
【24h】

'Inertia Creeps', or a phenomenological perspective on objects in sociology

机译:“惯性蠕变”或社会学中对象的现象学视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, the attitude of general sociology towards nature and objects is criticized. Usually, the social is so defined that it excludes objects, "things" in general But this limiting definition of the social has led to a proliferation of the concept of "society", which excludes first of all certain people - those not apart of a conscience collective - and second, it excludes objects from the social and thus from the realm of study of the social sciences. Yet objects, it is maintained here, have a very constitutive impact on social life. In order to clarify this, the paper aims to show two things: that there is a vocabulary with the help of which humans and non-humans can be sociologically described in a similar way; that objects cannot be sociologically explained away in the way a "radical" social constructivism would do.
机译:本文批评了一般社会学对自然和客体的态度。通常,社会的定义如此,以至于它排除了对象,即“事物”。但是,这种对社会的限制定义导致了“社会”概念的泛滥,该概念首先排除了某些特定的人,即不属于某人的人。良知集体-其次,它把对象从社会中排除,从而从社会科学的研究领域中排除。然而,这里保留的对象对社会生活具有非常重大的影响。为了阐明这一点,本文旨在展示两件事:存在一个词汇,借助它可以以相似的方式从社会学角度描述人类和非人类。不能以“激进的”社会建构主义的方式从社会学角度解释客体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号