...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of organizational behavior >Competing hypotheses analyses of the associations between group task conflict and group relationship conflict
【24h】

Competing hypotheses analyses of the associations between group task conflict and group relationship conflict

机译:小组任务冲突和小组关系冲突之间的关联的竞争假设分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although previous research have reported strong and positive intercorrelations between group task conflict and group relationship conflict, several different theoretical rationales exist for the positive link and the empirical literature remains equivocal. To clarify the causal linkage between the two types of conflict, we derived seven models specifying how group task and relationship conflict can be related to each other, including some rival explanations. We tested the competing models using a longitudinal panel design, with data collected from 74 project teams comprising a total of 388 students. The results indicated that relationship conflict led to an increased subsequent task conflict through negative group affect. Task conflict, however, predicted a subsequent relationship conflict under a specific context, that is, groups that had lower levels of trust among the members.
机译:尽管先前的研究已经报告了小组任务冲突和小组关系冲突之间的强烈和积极的相互关系,但是对于积极的联系,存在几种不同的理论依据,而经验文献仍然是模棱两可的。为了阐明两种类型冲突之间的因果关系,我们导出了七个模型,这些模型指定了小组任务和关系冲突如何相互关联,其中包括一些相互竞争的解释。我们使用纵向面板设计测试了竞争模型,并从74个项目团队(共388名学生)中收集了数据。结果表明,关系冲突通过负面的小组影响导致后续任务冲突的增加。但是,任务冲突预测了在特定环境下的后续关系冲突,即在成员之间信任度较低的组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号