...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Advanced Lipoprotein Testing Does Not Improve Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Young Adults: The Bogalusa Heart Study
【24h】

Advanced Lipoprotein Testing Does Not Improve Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Young Adults: The Bogalusa Heart Study

机译:先进的脂蛋白测试不能改善年轻人中亚临床动脉粥样硬化的识别:Bogalusa心脏研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The clinical value of advanced lipoprotein testing relative to traditional lipid testing remains controversial. To date, no studies have evaluated associations between advanced lipoprotein testing and subclinical atherosclerosis in healthy young adults. nnObjective: To determine whether advanced lipoprotein testing using vertical-spin density-gradient ultracentrifugation better predicts carotid intima-media thickness, a validated measure of subclinical atherosclerosis, than does traditional lipoprotein testing in asymptomatic young adults. nnDesign: Cross-sectional community-based study. nnSetting: Bogalusa, Louisiana. nnParticipants: 311 randomly selected adults from the Bogalusa Heart Study who were 20 to 38 years of age. nnMeasurements: The authors performed advanced lipoprotein testing using vertical-spin density-gradient ultracentrifugation, traditional testing using enzymatic methods, and Friedewald formula estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. A certified reader blinded to lipoprotein results determined carotid intima-media thickness by B-mode ultrasonography. C-statistics from area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) derived from multivariable regression models were compared. nnResults: Lipid values obtained with advanced lipoprotein testing did not predict carotid intima-media thickness better than traditionally measured lipid values in 236 participants for whom all data were available. A model using traditional lipoprotein measures (AUC, 0.754 [95% CI, 0.690 to 0.812]) did not differ significantly from a model using advanced lipoprotein measures (AUC, 0.779 [CI, 0.662 to 0.871]) for prediction of carotid intima-media thickness (P > 0.2). Subclass pattern of LDL, lipoprotein(a) cholesterol, intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol subclasses, and very-low-density lipoprotein subclasses did not improve the performance of models for prediction of carotid intima-media thickness. nnLimitations: The study was cross-sectional, cardiac events were not determined, and only 1 method of advanced lipoprotein testing was used. nnConclusions: Advanced lipoprotein testing using vertical-spin density-gradient ultracentrifugation did not improve prediction of carotid intima-media thickness in young adults and may not be useful for assessing cardiovascular risk in this population.
机译:背景:相对于传统脂质检测,高级脂蛋白检测的临床价值仍存在争议。迄今为止,尚无研究评估健康年轻人中高级脂蛋白检测与亚临床动脉粥样硬化之间的关联。目的:为了确定使用垂直旋转密度梯度超速离心进行的高级脂蛋白检测是否比无症状年轻成年人的传统脂蛋白检测更好地预测了颈动脉内膜中层厚度,这是一种经过临床验证的亚临床动脉粥样硬化测量指标。 nnDesign:基于社区的横断面研究。地点:路易斯安那州博加卢萨。参与者:从Bogalusa心脏研究中随机选择的311名年龄在20至38岁之间的成年人。 nn测量:作者使用垂直旋转密度梯度超速离心进行了高级脂蛋白测试,使用酶法进行了传统测试,并通过Friedewald公式估算了低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平。一位对脂蛋白结果不了解的合格阅读器通过B型超声检查确定了颈动脉内膜中层厚度。比较了来自多元回归模型的接收器工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积的C统计量。结果:在可获得全部数据的236名参与者中,通过高级脂蛋白测试获得的血脂值没有比传统测量的血脂值更好地预测颈动脉内膜中层厚度。使用传统脂蛋白测量(AUC,0.754 [95%CI,0.690至0.812])的模型与使用先进脂蛋白测量(AUC,0.779 [CI,0.662至0.871])的模型对颈动脉内膜中层的预测没有显着差异厚度(P> 0.2)。 LDL,脂蛋白(a)胆固醇,中密度脂蛋白胆固醇,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇亚类和极低密度脂蛋白亚类的亚类模式并不能改善预测颈动脉内膜中层厚度的模型的性能。局限性:研究是横断面的,未确定心脏事件,仅使用了一种高级脂蛋白检测方法。 nn结论:使用垂直旋转密度梯度超速离心进行的高级脂蛋白测试不能改善年轻成年人颈动脉内膜中层厚度的预测,可能无法用于评估该人群的心血管风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号