...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Surveillance for Hospital Outbreaks of Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections in Ontario, Canada, 1992 to 2000
【24h】

Surveillance for Hospital Outbreaks of Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections in Ontario, Canada, 1992 to 2000

机译:1992年至2000年加拿大安大略省侵袭性A组链球菌感染的医院暴发监测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Streptococcus pyogenes can cause severe disease in the individual patient and dramatic hospital outbreaks. nnObjective: To describe the epidemiology of hospital outbreaks of invasive group A streptococcal infection in order to understand the potential benefit of proposed outbreak investigation and management strategies. nnDesign: Prospective, population-based surveillance. nnSetting: Short-term care hospitals in Ontario, Canada. nnPatients: Persons with a positive culture for group A streptococcus from a normally sterile site between 1 January 1992 and 31 December 2000. nnMeasurements: Laboratory-based surveillance identified patients with nosocomial invasive group A streptococcal infection. Epidemiologic and microbiological investigations were used to detect transmission. nnResults: Of 2351 cases of invasive group A streptococcal disease, 291 (12%) were hospital acquired. Twenty-nine (10%) nosocomial cases occurred as part of 20 outbreaks. Seventy percent (14 of 20) of outbreaks involved nonsurgical, nonobstetric patients. Community-acquired cases initiated 25% of outbreaks; most were cases of necrotizing fasciitis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Outbreaks were small (median, 2 cases [range, 2 to 10 cases]) and short (median duration, 6 days [range, 0 to 30 days]). The median time between the first 2 cases was 4.5 days. The most common mode of propagation was patient-to-patient transmission. A staff carrier was the primary mode of transmission in 2 (10%) outbreaks, but 1 or more health care workers were colonized with the outbreak strain in 6 of 18 (33%) other outbreaks. nnLimitations: Some outbreaks with 1 case of invasive disease may have been missed; advice provided to participating hospitals may have reduced the number and size of outbreaks. nnConclusions: Practices to prevent hospital transmission of group A streptococci should include isolation of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with necrotizing fasciitis, investigation after a single nosocomial case, and emphasis on identifying and treating health care worker carriers on surgical and obstetric services and patient reservoirs on other wards. nn*For members of the Ontario Group A Streptococcal Study Group, see the Appendix.
机译:化脓性链球菌可在个别患者中引起严重疾病,并引起严重的医院暴发。 nn目的:描述侵袭性A组链球菌感染的医院暴发流行病学,以了解拟议的暴发调查和管理策略的潜在益处。 nnDesign:基于人群的前瞻性监视。 nn设置:加拿大安大略省的短期护理医院。 nn患者:1992年1月1日至2000年12月31日期间,从正常无菌场所获得A组链球菌培养阳性的人。nn测量:基于实验室的监测确定了医院侵袭性A组链球菌感染的患者。流行病学和微生物学调查用于检测传播。结果:在侵害性A组链球菌疾病2351例中,有291例(12%)被医院获得。在20例暴发中,有29例(10%)医院内病例发生。百分之七十(占20的爆发)涉及非手术,非产科患者。社区获得性病例引发了25%的暴发;重症监护病房的患者中大多数是坏死性筋膜炎。暴发较小(中位2例[范围,2至10例])和短时(中位病程,6天[0至30天])。前两例之间的中位时间为4.5天。最常见的传播方式是患者之间的传播。在2例(10%)暴发中,工作人员携带者是主要的传播方式,但在18例其他暴发中,有6例(33%)的暴发菌株定植了1名或更多的医护人员。 nnLimitations:可能未发现1例侵袭性疾病的暴发;向参与医院提供的建议可能减少了疾病暴发的数量和规模。结论:预防A类链球菌医院传播的措施应包括隔离入院重症筋膜炎的重症监护病房,在单例医院病例后进行调查,并强调在外科和产科服务以及患者身上识别和治疗医护人员其他病房的水库。 nn *对于安大略省A组链球菌研究组的成员,请参阅附录。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号