...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Postpolypectomy Colonoscopy Surveillance Guidelines: Predictive Accuracy for Advanced Adenoma at 4 Years
【24h】

Postpolypectomy Colonoscopy Surveillance Guidelines: Predictive Accuracy for Advanced Adenoma at 4 Years

机译:息肉切除术后结肠镜检查监测指南:晚期腺瘤4年的预测准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Lack of confidence in postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines may be a factor in the observed low adherence rates among providers. nnObjective: To assess the 2006 postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines, which recommend 3-year follow-up colonoscopy for individuals with high-risk adenomas (defined as ≥3 adenomas or any advanced adenomas) and 5- to 10-year follow-up for patients with 2 or fewer nonadvanced adenomas, who are considered to be at low risk. nnDesign: Analysis of prospective data from the Polyp Prevention Trial. nnSetting: United States. nnParticipants: 1905 patients who had colorectal adenomas removed at baseline screening or diagnostic colonoscopy and completed the trial. nnMeasurements: Baseline adenoma characteristics, risk-stratified according to definitions used in the guidelines, were examined as predictors for advanced adenoma recurrence. nnResults: 125 patients (6.6%) had advanced and 629 (33.0%) had nonadvanced adenoma recurrence; 1151 (60.4%) had no recurrence within 4 years of follow-up. The probability of advanced adenoma recurrence was 0.09 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.11) among patients with high-risk adenomas at baseline and 0.05 (CI, 0.04 to 0.06) among those with low-risk adenomas at baseline. The relative risk for advanced adenoma recurrence for patients with high-risk adenomas versus those with low-risk adenomas at baseline was 1.68 (CI, 1.19 to 2.38) when advanced adenoma recurrence was compared with no advanced adenoma recurrence and 1.76 (CI, 1.26 to 2.46) when advanced adenoma recurrence was compared with no adenoma recurrence. The c-statistics for these 2 comparisons were 0.68 and 0.72, respectively. nnLimitation: Participants were self-selected and had restrictions on the degree of obesity. nnConclusion: Although the risk for recurrence of advanced adenoma within 4 years is greater for patients with high-risk adenomas at baseline than for those with low-risk adenomas, the discrimination of this risk stratification scheme is relatively low. nnEditors' NotesnContextnGuidelines for surveillance colonoscopy after removing a colon polyp recommend more frequent surveillance after a high-risk finding at baseline (an advanced adenoma or ≥3 adenomas). nnContributionnThe authors studied 1905 patients who had an adenoma at baseline colonoscopy and had follow-up colonoscopy at 1 year and 4 years. Overall, 6.6% had an advanced adenoma—considered to be high risk to become malignant—at 4 years. The advanced adenoma rates were 9% and 5% in patients with high-risk and low-risk adenomas at baseline colonoscopy, respectively. nnImplicationnThe characteristics of an adenoma are not a reliable guide to the probability of recurrence of an advanced adenoma.nn—The EditorsnnClinical practice guidelines for postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance have been developed by different professional societies and updated as necessary on the basis of scientific evidence (1–4). However, surveys of gastrointestinal endoscopists (5) and primary care physicians (6, 7) have consistently shown a lack of adherence to surveillance guidelines, with repeated examinations being recommended at shorter intervals than the guidelines indicate. This suggests an overuse of surveillance colonoscopy, which already constitutes approximately 24% of procedures performed in the United States (8). Nonadherence may be due to a lack of knowledge of the guidelines, medical liability concerns, financial incentives, and differing recommendations by professional societies. nnThe U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society jointly developed and published a consensus update for postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines in 2006 to provide more consistency among guidelines (9). Patients were stratified as having high risk or low risk for subsequent development of advanced neoplasia on the basis of adenoma characteristics at baseline. The guidelines classify patients with 3 or more synchronous adenomas or any advanced adenomas (adenomas ≥1 cm in diameter or with a villous histology or high-grade dysplasia) as high risk. Individuals found to be at high risk at baseline are to have follow-up colonoscopy in 3 years, whereas those with fewer, nonadvanced, adenomatous polyps (low-risk patients) are to have repeated examination in 5 to 10 years. The guidelines recommend 10-year follow-up evaluation for average-risk individuals (those with no adenomatous polyps). nnLack of confidence in the postpolypectomy guidelines may be a common reason for nonadherence. According to Mysliwiec and colleagues (5), approximately 80% of surveyed endoscopists indicated that published evidence was very influential in their practice, but only half the respondents indicated that practice guidelines were very influential. This response highlights a perceived disconnect between published evidence and postpolypectomy guidelines. In another survey, 17% to 21% of gastroenterologists knew the guidelines but disregarded them, opting for earlier surveillance colonoscopy (10). Merritt and colleagues (11) reported that clinical practice guidelines are often fast-tracked without an adequate evaluation of their effectiveness. Therefore, validating guidelines may increase physicians' confidence and improve adherence. Our study is a step in that direction. nnWe sought to assess the utility of the risk-based stratification recommended by the current guidelines, using data from the dietary PPT (Polyp Prevention Trial). We measured the ability of adenoma characteristics at baseline (as defined in the 2006 consensus update on postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines) to predict subsequent advanced adenoma recurrence within 4 years.
机译:背景:对息肉切除术后监测指南的缺乏信心可能是观察到的提供者依从性低的一个因素。 nn目的:评估2006年息肉切除术后结肠镜检查的监测指南,该指南建议对高危腺瘤(定义为≥3腺瘤或任何晚期腺瘤)和患者进行5至10年随访的患者进行3年随访结肠镜检查有2个或更少的非晚期腺瘤,被认为是低风险的。 nnDesign:对息肉预防试验的预期数据进行分析。 nn设置:美国。参与者:1905例在基线筛查或诊断性结肠镜检查中切除了结直肠腺瘤并完成了试验的患者。测量:根据指南中定义的风险分层基线腺瘤特征,作为晚期腺瘤复发的预测因素进行了检查。结果:125例(6.6%)晚期进展,629例(33.0%)晚期腺瘤复发;随访4年内1151例(60.4%)没有复发。基线高危腺瘤患者晚期腺瘤复发的可能性为0.09(95%CI,0.07至0.11),基线低危腺瘤患者为0.05(CI,0.04至0.06)。当将晚期腺瘤复发与无晚期腺瘤复发进行比较时,基线时高危腺瘤患者与低危腺瘤患者晚期腺瘤复发的相对风险为1.68(CI,1.19至2.38)和1.76(CI,1.26至1.26 2.46),将晚期腺瘤复发与无腺瘤复发进行比较。这两个比较的c统计量分别为0.68和0.72。限制:参与者是自行选择的,并且对肥胖程度有限制。结论:尽管基线高危腺瘤患者比低危腺瘤患者4年内晚期腺瘤复发的风险更大,但这种风险分层方案的辨别率相对较低。 nnEditors的NotesnContextn去除结肠息肉后进行结肠镜检查的指南建议,在基线出现高风险(晚期腺瘤或≥3个腺瘤)后,应更频繁地进行监视。作者对1905例基线结肠镜检查中有腺瘤并在1年和4年时进行了随访结肠镜检查的患者进行了研究。总体而言,在4年时,有6.6%的患者患有晚期腺瘤-被认为是恶性肿瘤的高风险。在基线结肠镜检查中,高危和低危腺瘤患者的晚期腺瘤发生率分别为9%和5%。 nnnnnn腺瘤的特征并不是晚期腺瘤复发可能性的可靠指南。nn—Editorsn息肉切除术后结肠镜检查的临床实践指南已由不同的专业学会制定,并根据科学证据进行了必要的更新(1 – 4)。但是,对胃肠内镜医师(5)和基层医疗医生(6、7)的调查始终显示出缺乏对监测指南的依从性,因此建议以比指南所指示的间隔短的时间进行重复检查。这表明监测结肠镜检查的过度使用,在美国已占大约24%(8)。不遵守可能是由于缺乏对准则的了解,医疗责任问题,经济诱因以及专业协会的不同建议。 nn美国结肠直肠癌多社会工作组与美国癌症协会于2006年联合制定并发布了息肉切除术后监测指南的共识更新,以在指南之间提供更多的一致性(9)。根据基线的腺瘤特征,将患者分为晚期肿瘤形成的高风险或低风险。该指南将患有3个或更多同步腺瘤或任何晚期腺瘤(直径≥1 cm的腺瘤或有绒毛组织学或高度不典型增生)的患者归为高危患者。被发现基线风险高的个体应在3年内进行结肠镜检查,而那些腺瘤性息肉较少,未进展的个体(低风险患者)则应在5至10年内进行重复检查。该指南建议对平均风险的个体(无腺瘤性息肉的个体)进行十年随访评估。 nn对息肉切除术后指南缺乏信心可能是不坚持治疗的常见原因。根据Mysliwiec及其同事(5)的说法,大约80%的内镜医师表示已发表的证据对他们的实践非常有影响力,但只有一半的受访者表示实践准则非常有影响力。这种反应突出显示了已发表的证据与息肉切除术后指南之间的脱节。在另一项调查中,有17%到21%的胃肠病医生知道该指导原则,但无视这些指导原则,而是选择了早期的监测结肠镜检查(10)。 Merritt及其同事(11)报告说,临床实践指南经常被快速跟踪,而没有对其有效性进行充分评估。因此,验证指南可能会增加医师的信心并提高依从性。我们的研究是朝这个方向迈出的一步。 nn我们试图利用饮食中的PPT(预防息肉试验)数据评估当前指南建议的基于风险分层的效用。我们测量了基线时腺瘤特征的能力(如2006年关于息肉切除术后监测指南的共识更新所定义),以预测随后4年内晚期腺瘤复发的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号