首页> 外文期刊>Journal of operations management >A theory of formal conceptual definitions: developing theory-building measurement instruments
【24h】

A theory of formal conceptual definitions: developing theory-building measurement instruments

机译:形式概念定义的理论:开发建立理论的测量工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study develops the need for formal conceptual definitions (sometimes called nominal definitions) and how to develop better measurement instruments for theory-building. It develops the underlying theory for 'good' formal conceptual definitions by defining terms, demonstrating that formal conceptual definitions are needed for all theory-building empirical research, explains how and why 'good' formal conceptual definitions are used to develop properties and their measures, and last, it logically explains that good formal conceptual definitions are necessary conditions for construct validity (content validity, criterion validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity) while statistical tests are sufficient conditions for validity. This theory development explains why formal conceptual definitions are necessary before any traditional statistical empirical validity tests are performed. This study suggests that any statistical validity tests are not meaningful if the concept is not formally defined. In short, the theory of formal conceptual definitions provides a structure to develop 'good' measures of the formal theory that leads to 'good' empirical theory-building.
机译:这项研究提出了对正式概念定义(有时称为名义定义)的需求,以及如何为理论构建开发更好的度量工具。它通过定义术语来开发“良好”正式概念定义的基础理论,证明所有理论构建实证研究都需要正式概念定义,并解释了如何以及为何使用“良好”正式概念定义来开发属性及其度量,最后,从逻辑上讲,良好的形式概念定义是构筑效度(内容效度,标准效度,收敛效度和判别效度)的必要条件,而统计检验是效度的充分条件。这一理论发展解释了为什么在进行任何传统的统计经验有效性检验之前,必须要有正式的概念定义。这项研究表明,如果没有正式定义概念,则任何统计有效性检验均无意义。简而言之,形式概念定义的理论为发展形式理论的“良好”度量提供了一种结构,从而导致了“良好”的经验理论构建。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号