首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation >Differences Among Outcome Measures in Occupational Low Back Pain
【24h】

Differences Among Outcome Measures in Occupational Low Back Pain

机译:职业性下腰痛结果指标之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The rate of recurrence in low back pain patients has been reported as high as 70%; therefore, it is believed that researchers have a poor understanding of low back pain recovery. To enhance our understanding of recovery, a large cross-sectional study was conducted to compare outcome measures of return to work, impairment of activities of daily living, pain symptoms, and functional performance probability. A total of 208 workers were examined. The percentage of workers recovered based on return to work criteria was 99% compared to 25% for impairment of activities of daily living, 17% for symptoms, and 12.5% for functional performance probability. Single functional performance measures of range of motion, velocity, and acceleration had recovery rates of 59, 13, and 10%, respectively. It appears that all these criteria are measuring very different parameters of low back pain recovery. The residual loss in functional performance may indicate a decreased tolerance to physical demand providing potential insight for why recurrent low back pain rates are high.
机译:据报道,下腰痛患者的复发率高达70%。因此,据信研究人员对腰痛的恢复了解甚少。为了增强我们对康复的理解,进行了一项大型的横断面研究,以比较恢复工作,日常生活活动受损,疼痛症状和功能表现可能性的结果指标。总共检查了208名工人。根据重返工作标准恢复的工人百分比为99%,而日常生活活动受损的比例为25%,症状的比例为17%,功能表现概率的比例为12.5%。运动,速度和加速度范围的单个功能性能指标的恢复率分别为59%,13%和10%。似乎所有这些标准都在测量腰痛恢复的非常不同的参数。功能性表现的残余丧失可能表明对身体需求的耐受性降低,从而为为什么反复出现的下背痛率高的原因提供了潜在的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号