首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of North African Studies >European Union responses to conflict in the western Mediterranean
【24h】

European Union responses to conflict in the western Mediterranean

机译:欧洲联盟对地中海西部冲突的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The European Union (EU) announced an increased commitment to conflict resolution beyond its external border when it adopted the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2003, yet this has not led to any practical initiatives in the western Mediterranean. While the more latent nature of conflicts there puts less pressure on the EU to act than do the ‘hot’ conflicts of the Middle East, various disputes over territorial sovereignty persist and tend to undermine the broader EU ambition to promote stability, Euro-Mediterranean cooperation and region-building. In addition to the bilateral disputes over Gibraltar, Ceuta, Melilla and a number of Spanish islands and rocks off the Mediterranean coast of Morocco, there is the broader regional conflict over Western Sahara, which has long brought tension to relations between Morocco and Algeria and between Spain and each of these North African countries, while also frustrating efforts to build the Arab Maghreb Union. Analysis of the EU's weak responses to both the deadlocked Saharan conflict and to the more recent confrontation that took place between Spain and Morocco over Parsley Island in 2002 shows the importance of internal EU divisions and the Union's concern not to upset partners in North Africa, especially Morocco. Yet, despite the EU's reluctance and/or inability to engage in conflict resolution in the western Mediterranean, its policies do have consequences for regional conflicts, even when the EU claims to be neutral. Its privileging of relations with Morocco involves an acceptance that the Moroccan authorities are valid interlocutors for reaching agreements that affect Western Sahara.View full textDownload full textKeywordsEurope, Mediterranean, neighbourhood, conflict, Spain, MoroccoRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13629380902920545
机译:欧洲联盟(EU)在2003年通过了《欧洲邻里政策》时宣布了对解决外部冲突的更大承诺,但这并未导致在地中海西部采取任何实际行动。尽管那里冲突的潜在性质比中东的“热点”冲突对欧盟采取行动的压力要小,但有关领土主权的各种争端仍然存在,并有损于欧盟促进稳定的更大野心。 -地中海合作与区域建设。除了在直布罗陀,休达,梅利利亚以及摩洛哥地中海沿岸的许多西班牙岛屿和岩石上的双边争端外,西撒哈拉地区的地区冲突更为广泛,长期以来一直给摩洛哥与阿尔及利亚之间以及两国之间的关系带来紧张局势西班牙和每个北非国家,同时也挫败了建立阿拉伯马格里布联盟的努力。对欧盟对僵持的撒哈拉冲突以及对2002年西班牙和摩洛哥在欧芹岛上最近发生的对抗的较弱反应的分析表明,欧盟内部分歧的重要性以及欧盟对不扰乱北非伙伴的担忧,特别是摩洛哥。然而,尽管欧盟不愿和/或无力在地中海西部解决冲突,但即使欧盟声称自己是中立的,其政策也确实对区域冲突产生了影响。摩洛哥与摩洛哥的特权关系被接受,即摩洛哥当局是达成影响西撒哈拉协议的有效对话者。查看全文下载全文关键字欧洲,地中海,邻里,冲突,西班牙,摩洛哥相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,网络振动,微博,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13629380902920545

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号