首页> 外文期刊>Civil wars >European Union Conflict Management in the Western Balkans
【24h】

European Union Conflict Management in the Western Balkans

机译:欧盟在西巴尔干地区的冲突管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Following a brief overview of the European Union's (EU) conflict management 'history', this article discusses the evolution of EU capabilities throughout the Union's involvement in the Western Balkans since the early 1990s. This is followed by a detailed case study of the EU intervention in Macedonia - Operation Concordia - and the contextual factors of that conflict, which shaped the outcomes of the EU's military efforts there. We conclude from this that the EU, alongside its partners in and beyond Macedonia, successfully prevented a likely civil war in the country in 2001, because the Union had a clearly defined set of interests, shared across institutions and member states, and interests that matched those of the main political players in Macedonia. This translated into sufficient political will to deploy sufficient military capabilities suited to the context of conflict management in Macedonia. However, we remain cautious as to whether the Union can muster similar levels of political will as well as the necessary capabilities to achieve the same elsewhere in the world.
机译:在简要概述了欧盟(EU)冲突管理的“历史”之后,本文讨论了自1990年代初以来整个欧盟参与西巴尔干地区的过程中欧盟能力的演变。接下来是对欧盟对马其顿的干预-Concordia行动-的具体案例研究,以及该冲突的背景因素,这些因素决定了欧盟在马其顿的军事努力的结果。由此我们可以得出结论,欧盟与马其顿内外的合作伙伴一起成功地阻止了2001年该国可能发生的内战,因为欧盟拥有一套明确定义的利益,在各个机构和成员国之间享有共同的利益,而且利益相称马其顿的主要政治人物。这转化为足够的政治意愿,以部署适合马其顿冲突管理情况的足够军事能力。但是,我们对欧盟是否可以召集相似水平的政治意愿以及在世界其他地方实现相同水平的必要能力仍持谨慎态度。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Civil wars》 |2012年第3期|p.5-6414-430|共19页
  • 作者单位

    University of Southern Denmark (SDU);

    International Security at the University of Birmingham,UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号