...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurology >Comparison of smooth pursuit eye movement deficits in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson’s disease
【24h】

Comparison of smooth pursuit eye movement deficits in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson’s disease

机译:多系统萎缩和帕金森氏病的平滑追逐眼球运动缺陷比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Because of the large overlap and quantitative similarity of eye movement alterations in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA), a measurement of eye movement is generally not considered helpful for the differential diagnosis. However, in view of the pathophysiological differences between MSA and PD as well as between the cerebellar (MSA-C) and Parkinsonian (MSA-P) subtypes of MSA, we wondered whether a detailed investigation of oculomotor performance would unravel parameters that could help to differentiate between these entities. We recorded eye movements during sinusoidal pursuit tracking by means of video-oculography in 11 cases of MSA-P, 8 cases of MSA-C and 27 cases of PD and compared them to 23 healthy controls (CTL). The gain of the smooth pursuit eye movement (SPEM) component exhibited significant group differences between each of the three subject groups (MSA, PD, controls) but not between MSA-P and MSA-C. The similarity of pursuit impairment in MSA-P and in MSA-C suggests a commencement of cerebellar pathology in MSA-P despite the lack of clinical signs. Otherwise, SPEM gain was of little use for differential diagnosis between MSA and PD because of wide overlap. However, inspection of the saccadic component of pursuit tracking revealed that in MSA saccades typically correct for position errors accumulated during SPEM epochs (“catch-up saccades”), whereas in PD, saccades were often directed toward future target positions (“anticipatory saccades”). The differences in pursuit tracking between PD and MSA were large enough to warrant their use as ancillary diagnostic criteria for the distinction between these disorders.
机译:由于帕金森氏病(PD)和多系统萎缩(MSA)中眼球运动变化的重叠和定量相似性,通常认为对眼球运动的测量无助于鉴别诊断。然而,鉴于MSA和PD以及小脑(MSA-C)和帕金森氏(MSA-P)亚型之间的病理生理差异,我们想知道对动眼功能的详细研究是否会揭示出有助于区分这些实体。我们通过视频眼动记录法在正弦曲线追踪追踪过程中记录了11例MSA-P,8例MSA-C和27例PD的眼球运动,并将其与23个健康对照(CTL)进行了比较。平滑追踪眼动(SPEM)组件的增益在三个受试者组(MSA,PD,对照)中的每个受试者之间表现出显着的组差异,但在MSA-P和MSA-C之间没有差异。 MSA-P和MSA-C中追求障碍的相似性表明,尽管缺乏临床体征,但MSA-P中的小脑病理开始。否则,由于重叠很大,SPEM增益在MSA和PD之间的鉴别诊断中几乎没有用。但是,对追踪跟踪的跳动部分进行检查后发现,在MSA扫视中,通常可以纠正在SPEM时期(“追赶扫视”)期间积累的位置误差,而在PD中,扫视通常是指向未来的目标位置(“预期扫视”)。 )。 PD和MSA在追踪追踪方面的差异足够大,足以保证将其用作这些疾病之间区别的辅助诊断标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号