首页> 外文期刊>Journal for nature conservation >A bio-economic analysis of conflicts between illegal hunting and wildlife management in Cameroon: The case of Campo-Ma'an National Park
【24h】

A bio-economic analysis of conflicts between illegal hunting and wildlife management in Cameroon: The case of Campo-Ma'an National Park

机译:喀麦隆非法狩猎与野生动物管理冲突的生物经济分析:坎帕 - 马安国家公园的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using bio-economic modelling, this paper analyses conflicts between legal and illegal activities in the CampoMa'an National Park, Cameroon. We consider two different agents, a local community living near the Park - who hunt illegally to fulfil their welfare -, and a park manager who has received from the Cameroonian government the mandate to manage the wildlife found in the park. The park manager is assumed to practice an imperfect anti-poaching policy due to the persistence of poaching activities in the study area. Both agents are assumed to proceed in strategic and asymmetric interdependency where the park manager determines the anti-poaching effort and then the local people have to adjust their behaviour within a full park scheme. In a bid to reduce illegal hunting, the social planner - the Cameroonian government - then tries to implement another scheme in which the local people are allowed to hunt in the surrounding area of the park, through the establishment of community hunting zones. This park-plus-hunting scheme is an example of Integrated and Conservation Development Project. The empirical analysis is based on data drawn from different sources. Results show that the antipoaching efforts, the wildlife stock and the harvesting rate are lesser when some hunting rights are allowed to local people as compared to what they are under full park regime. However, by recognizing some hunting rights to the local people, the share of income lost by the park is almost recovered and all poachers leave the underground to exercise in legality as hunters.
机译:本文采用生物经济型号,分析了喀麦隆坎帕诺群岛国家公园的法律和非法活动之间的冲突。我们考虑两个不同的代理商,一个居住在公园附近的当地社区 - 他们非法追捕他们的福利 - 以及从喀麦隆政府那里收到的公园经理,该经理在喀麦隆政府中获得了管理在公园中发现的野生动物的任务。由于研究区域的偷猎活动持续存在,该公园经理假设实践不完美的反偷猎政策。假设两个代理商在战略和不对称的相互依赖程度中进行,其中公园经理决定了反偷猎努力,然后当地人必须在完整的公园计划内调整他们的行为。为了减少非法狩猎,社会策划者 - 喀麦隆政府 - 然后试图通过建立社区狩猎区,实施当地人被允许在公园周边地区捕猎当地人。该公园加狩猎计划是综合和保护开发项目的一个例子。实证分析基于来自不同来源的数据。结果表明,当允许某些狩猎权限的地方人员相比,当地人在完全公园制度下,当允许某些狩猎权允许时,野生动物股票和收获率较小。然而,通过认识到当地人的一些狩猎权,公园损失的收入份额几乎恢复,所有偷猎者将地下留下了猎人的合法性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号