首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law >A Survey of Constitutional Standing in State Courts
【24h】

A Survey of Constitutional Standing in State Courts

机译:州法院宪法地位调查

获取原文
       

摘要

In sum, federal constitutional standing doctrine has had a more pervasive influence than one would suspect, but not a controlling influence on the development of constitutional standing doctrine in the states. Most states distinguish between the structure of the state and federal courts, and avoid adopting federal doctrine without regard to their own precedent or circumstances. Nevertheless, development of constitutional standing requirements in federal courts undoubtedly prompted state courts to take up the issue and develop approaches following the path blazed by federal decisions. For purposes of the type of constitutional standing articulated in Lujan, the federal courts were the first mover in all but a very small minority of states.
机译:总而言之,联邦宪法地位学说的影响力比人们所想像的要普遍得多,但对各州宪法地位学说的发展却没有控制作用。大多数州区分州法院和联邦法院的结构,并避免在不考虑其先例或情况的情况下采用联邦学说。然而,联邦法院宪法地位要求的发展无疑促使州法院着手解决这一问题,并沿着联邦判决所开拓的道路发展方法。就卢安(Lujan)所表达的宪法地位而言,除了极少数州外,联邦法院是所有其他州的先驱。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Wyatt Sassman;

  • 作者单位

    Vanderbilt University. Associate Attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center, Charleston, South Carolina.Charleston School of Law;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:55:05

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号