...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Nanoparticle Research >Chemical action: what is it, and why does it really matter?
【24h】

Chemical action: what is it, and why does it really matter?

机译:化学作用:什么是化学作用,为什么真正重要?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nanotechnology, as with many technologies before it, places a strain on existing legislation and poses a challenge to all administrative agencies tasked with regulating technology-based products. It is easy to see how statutory schemes become outdated, as our ability to understand and affect the world progresses. In this article, we address the regulatory problems that nanotechnology posses for the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) classification structure for “drugs” and “devices.” The last major modification to these terms was in 1976, with the enactment of the Medical Device Amendments. There are serious practical differences for a classification as a drug or device in terms of time to market and research. Drugs are classified, primarily, as acting by “chemical action.” We lay out some legal, philosophic, and scientific tools that serve to provide a useful, as well as legally and scientifically faithful, distinction between drugs and devices for the purpose of regulatory classification. These issues we raise are worth the consideration of anyone who is interested in the regulation of nano-products or other novel technologies.
机译:纳米技术与之前的许多技术一样,对现有立法造成压力,并对所有负责监管基于技术的产品的行政机构构成挑战。随着我们了解和影响世界的能力不断发展,很容易看出法定计划是如何过时的。在本文中,我们解决了食品和药物管理局(FDA)对“药品”和“设备”进行分类的纳米技术所面临的监管问题。对这些术语的最后一次重大修改是在1976年,随着《医疗器械修正案》的颁布。就上市时间和研究时间而言,归类为药品或器械存在严重的实际差异。主要将药物归类为通过“化学作用”起作用。我们列出了一些法律,哲学和科学工具,这些工具可为监管分类提供有用的,法律上和科学上忠实的区分药物和设备的工具。我们提出的这些问题值得对纳米产品或其他新颖技术的法规感兴趣的任何人考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号