首页> 外文期刊>Journal of multicultural discourses >Our Culture, Their Culture and Beyond: Further Thoughts on Ethnocentrism in Hofstede's Discourse
【24h】

Our Culture, Their Culture and Beyond: Further Thoughts on Ethnocentrism in Hofstede's Discourse

机译:我们的文化,他们的文化及其超越:霍夫斯泰德话语中关于民族中心主义的进一步思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent years the work of Geert Hofstede and his cultural dimensions has been carefully reviewed by academic scholars and educators around the world. As a result of this more careful analysis and scrutiny there are now questions, and in some cases open criticism, of the assumptions Hofstede utilised in arriving at his conclusions and theories. Many of the previous reviews and criticisms focused on ontology, epistemology and methodology, etc. For instance, the debate concentrates mainly on five points: (1) surveys are inappropriate instruments to measure culture, (2) unit of analysis of nations is not the best unit suited for studying culture, (3) one company can't provide information about entire national cultures, (4) the IBM data is old and obsolete and (5) four dimensions can't tell the whole story (McSweeney, 2002).
机译:近年来,Geert Hofstede的工作及其文化层面受到了世界各地学术学者和教育工作者的认真审查。由于进行了更加仔细的分析和审查,现在人们对霍夫斯泰德在得出其结论和理论时所使用的假设提出了疑问,在某些情况下还提出了公开批评。先前的许多评论和批评都集中在本体论,认识论和方法论等方面。例如,辩论主要集中在五个方面:(1)调查是测量文化的不适当工具,(2)国家分析的单位不是最适合研究文化的部门,(3)一家公司无法提供有关整个民族文化的信息,(4)IBM数据陈旧且过时,(5)四个维度无法说明全部情况(McSweeney,2002) 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号