首页> 外文期刊>Journal of multicultural discourses >Discourses of identity: Outgroup stereotypes and strategies of discursive boundary-making in Chinese students' online discussions about 'the other'
【24h】

Discourses of identity: Outgroup stereotypes and strategies of discursive boundary-making in Chinese students' online discussions about 'the other'

机译:身份话语:中国学生关于“另一个”的在线讨论中的外来群体刻板印象和话语边界划定策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the public discourse about Mainland China (MLC) in Hong Kong (HK),China is usually presented as ingroup, and the "one-country-one-people" ideology is widely supported. In the private discourse, however, MLC is usually presented as outgroup. This article analyzes spontaneous online discussions from a chat forum where local and non-local Chinese students in an Intercultural Communication class discuss self- and other-categorizations in HK and MLC. The analyses demonstrate that a wide range of mitigation strategies is used, suggesting that students constantly engage in face-threatening activities. The data also show that HK students' stereotypes of MLC are remarkably negative, and that MLC students defend themselves by constructing counter-narratives about the rejected mother and her ungrateful child. The discussion argues that social identity is a flexible concept which constantly changes depending on context and situation, and it suggests that the students' narratives should be seen as examples of different types of discourse: a Western and an Eastern discourse with fundamentally different norms for self- and other-construction. Finally, the aper argues that only by addressing potentially painful issues, and verbalizing taboos in the strained relationship between HK and MLC, is it possible, over time, to reconcile the opposing discourses about "the other".
机译:在香港(香港)有关中国大陆(MLC)的公开讨论中,中国通常以团体形式出现,“一国一民”的思想得到了广泛支持。但是,在私人讨论中,MLC通常以小组形式出现。本文分析了来自聊天论坛的自发在线讨论,在该论坛上,本地人和非本地人在跨文化交流课程中的中国学生讨论了HK和MLC中的自我分类和其他分类。分析表明,使用了广泛的缓解策略,这表明学生不断从事威胁面部的活动。数据还显示,香港学生对MLC的刻板印象明显是负面的,并且MLC学生通过构建有关被拒绝的母亲和她的不感恩孩子的反叙事来捍卫自己。讨论认为,社会认同是一个灵活的概念,会随着上下文和情况的变化而不断变化,并建议将学生的叙述视为不同类型话语的示例:西方和东方话语的自我规范有根本不同-和其他建筑。最后,阿珀认为,只有通过解决潜在的痛苦问题,并说出HK和MLC之间紧张关系中的禁忌,随着时间的流逝,才有可能调和关于“另一个”的对立论述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号