首页> 外文期刊>Journal of multicultural discourses >A metatheory of mediatization and globalization?
【24h】

A metatheory of mediatization and globalization?

机译:中介化和全球化的元理论?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I appreciate the invitation to comment on Professor Sheldon Gunaratne's erudite and passionate call to engage with Eastern philosophy and religion to study mediatization and globalization. His article makes several important contributions. It reminds us about the limitations of Western-centrism to understand the planetary dimensions of communication and media processes. It foregrounds the need to widen the epistemological and conceptual horizons to study these issues across the world. It warns us about selecting monocausal explanations to comprehend complex phenomena that straddle political, economic, social, and cultural processes. Although important, the argument is not strictly novel. Communication researchers, including Gunaratne's distinguished scholarship, have long urged to integrate insights from non-Western philosophy and religion to challenge assumptions of Western theories and overcome their limitations. My interest here is to discuss the central themes in Gunaratne's analysis of mediatization and globalization and raise questions for future study.
机译:我感谢邀请对谢尔登·冈纳拉特教授(Sheldon Gunaratne)提出的博学热忱的评论发表评论,他呼吁东方哲学和宗教研究媒介化和全球化。他的文章做出了一些重要的贡献。它使我们想起了西方中心主义在理解传播和媒体过程的行星维度方面的局限性。它提出了扩大认识论和概念视野以研究全球这些问题的需求。它警告我们选择单因果的解释来理解跨越政治,经济,社会和文化进程的复杂现象。尽管很重要,但论点并不严格。长期以来,包括古纳拉特尼(Gunaratne)杰出学者在内的传播研究人员一直呼吁整合非西方哲学和宗教的见解,以挑战西方理论的假设并克服其局限性。我的兴趣是在讨论Gunaratne对中介化和全球化的分析中的中心主题,并提出一些问题以供将来研究。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of multicultural discourses》 |2013年第3期|182-189|共8页
  • 作者

    Silvio Waisbord;

  • 作者单位

    School of Media and Public Affairs, George Washington University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:45:12

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号