首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Moral Education >‘Moral ecology’ and ‘moral capital’: tools towards a sociology of moral education from a South African ethnography
【24h】

‘Moral ecology’ and ‘moral capital’: tools towards a sociology of moral education from a South African ethnography

机译:“道德生态”和“道德资本”:从南非人种志研究道德教育的社会学工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research and pedagogy in the field of morality and moral education has long been dominated by philosophical and psychological disciplines. Although sociological studies and theorising in the field have not been absent, it has been limited and non‐systematic. Drawing on a study that investigated the lived morality of a group of young South Africans growing up in the aftermath of Apartheid and in the townships of Cape Town, this paper surveys the historical contribution made by sociologists to the study of morality and introduces two sociological notions of importance to moral education research and practice: ‘moral ecology’ and ‘moral capital’. Employing Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory it describes the moral life as an ecology of interconnecting systems, complex antinomies, diverse codes, multiple positionings, discordant processes and competing influences, over time and on multiple levels. Moral capital, draws on Bourdieu’s work on capitals and is described in two ways. First, as a dialectic, such that young people living in poverty identify how being ‘good’ can be translated into economic capital, which in turn enables them to remain ‘good’. Second, it asks, what are the necessary elements of moral capital that young people need in order to be good and so attain the economic future to which they aspire? The paper concludes by noting how a sociology of moral education contributes to understanding the relationship between poverty and morality, including the social reproduction of morality; and its relevance for moral education research and practice.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2010.497611
机译:道德和道德教育领域的研究和教学法长期以来一直由哲学和心理学学科主导。尽管没有进行该领域的社会学研究和理论化,但它是有限的并且是非系统的。基于一项调查研究种族隔离后和开普敦乡镇中成长的南非青年群体的生活道德的研究,本文调查了社会学家对道德研究的历史贡献,并介绍了两种社会学概念对道德教育研究和实践的重要性:“道德生态”和“道德资本”。运用布朗芬布伦纳(Bronfenbrenner)的生态系统理论,将道德生活描述为相互联系的系统,复杂的对立,各种法规,多种定位,不和谐的过程和相互影响的生态,随着时间的推移和在多个层面上相互影响。道德资本借鉴了布迪厄在资本方面的工作,并以两种方式进行描述。首先,作为一种辩证法,使生活在贫困中的年轻人确定如何将“好”转化为经济资本,从而使他们能够保持“好”。其次,它问,年轻人为了变得良好并实现他们所追求的经济未来,需要什么道德资本?本文最后指出道德教育的社会学如何有助于理解贫困与道德之间的关系,包括道德的社会再生产。及其与德育研究和实践的相关性。查看全文下载全文相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google ,more“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2010.497611

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号