首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Moral Education >The relationship between empathy‐related constructs and care‐based moral development in young adulthood
【24h】

The relationship between empathy‐related constructs and care‐based moral development in young adulthood

机译:移情相关的构造与基于照料的青少年成年道德发展之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study examined the link between care‐based moral reasoning and three different aspects of empathy—perspective taking, sympathy and personal distress. Participants were 30 female and 28 male students, ranging in age from 20 to 42 years. As expected, results showed that perspective taking uniquely predicted care‐based moral reasoning levels (positively), as assessed by Skoe’s Ethic of Care Interview (ECI). Personal distress, in contrast, was uniquely negatively related to the ECI. There was a curvilinear relationship between sympathy and the ECI for women only; women at ECI Level 2 (self‐sacrificing care for others) scored higher on sympathy than did all others. Moreover, women scored significantly higher than did men on the emotional aspects of empathy (i.e. sympathy and personal distress) but not on cognitive perspective taking or on the ECI. These findings support the theory that empathy plays a significant (and positive) role in adults’ moral reasoning. They also highlight the complexity of sex differences in the area of moral affect and cognition. Implications for moral education are discussed.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057241003754930
机译:这项研究检验了基于护理的道德推理与共情的三个不同方面之间的联系,即同情心,个人同情和个人痛苦。参加者为30名女学生和28名男学生,年龄从20至42岁不等。正如预期的那样,结果显示,根据Skoe的《护理伦理学访谈》(ECI)评估,观点采用了基于独特预测的护理(正面)的道德推理水平。相比之下,个人困扰与ECI负相关。同情和ECI之间仅女性之间存在曲线关系。 ECI 2级(自我牺牲他人的照顾)的女性在同情方面的得分高于所有其他女性。此外,在同情的情感方面(即同情和个人困扰),女性的得分明显高于男性,但在认知观点或ECI方面却没有。这些发现支持了同理在成人道德推理中起着重要(积极)作用的理论。他们还强调了在道德影响和认知方面性别差异的复杂性。全文讨论了对道德教育的影响。 ,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057241003754930

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号