...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Monetary Economics >Understanding the inventory cycle
【24h】

Understanding the inventory cycle

机译:了解库存周期

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Careful examination of aggregate data from the U.S. and other OECD countries reveals that production and inventory behavior exhibit paradoxical features: (1) Inventory investment is strongly countercyclical at very high frequencies (e.g., 2-3 quarters per cycle); it is procyclical only at relatively low-cyclical frequencies such as the business-cycle frequencies (e.g., 8-40 quarters per cycle). (2) Production is less volatile than sales around the high frequencies; it is more volatile than sales only around business-cycle or lower frequencies. (3) Unlike capital investment or GDP, the bulk of the variance of inventory investment is concentrated around high frequencies rather than around business-cycle frequencies. These features of production and inventory behavior at the low and high frequencies provide a litmus test for inventory theories. This paper shows that the stockout-avoidance theory [Kahn, J., 1987. Inventories and the volatility of production. American Economic Review 77, 667-679.] has much better potential than other competing theories for explaining the seemingly paradoxical features of inventory fluctuations observed at different cyclical frequencies. My analysis suggests that demand shocks are the main source of the business cycle.
机译:仔细检查来自美国和其他OECD国家的汇总数据后发现,生产和库存行为表现出自相矛盾的特征:(1)库存投资在很高的频率下(例如每个周期2-3个季度)强烈反周期;它仅在相对较低的周期性频率(例如商业周期频率)(例如,每个周期8-40个季度)时才是周期性的。 (2)与高频销售相比,生产的波动性较小;它仅在商业周期或更短的周期内比销售更不稳定。 (3)与资本投资或GDP不同,库存投资的方差大部分集中在高频率附近,而不是在商业周期频率附近。低频和高频下生产和库存行为的这些特征为库存理论提供了试金石。本文表明了缺货回避理论[Kahn,J.,1987。存货与生产的波动性。 《美国经济评论》 77,667-679。]比其他竞争性理论有更好的潜力来解释在不同周期性频率下观察到的库存波动的看似矛盾的特征。我的分析表明,需求冲击是商业周期的主要来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号