首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Monetary Economics >Securitization and moral hazard: Evidence from credit score cutoff rules
【24h】

Securitization and moral hazard: Evidence from credit score cutoff rules

机译:证券化和道德风险:信用评分截止规则的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A growing literature exploits credit score cutoff rules as a natural experiment to estimate the moral hazard effect of securitization on lender screening. However, these cutoff rules can be traced to underwriting guidelines for originators, not for securitizers. Moreover, loan-level data reveal that lenders change their screening at credit score cutoffs in the absence of changes in the probability of securitization. Credit score cutoff rules thus cannot be used to learn about the moral hazard effect of securitization on underwriting. By showing that this evidence has been misinterpreted, our analysis should move beliefs away from the conclusion that securitization led to lax screening.
机译:越来越多的文献将信用评分截断规则用作自然实验,以评估证券化对贷方筛选的道德风险影响。但是,这些截止规则可以追溯到发起人而不是证券化人的承保准则。此外,贷款水平的数据表明,在没有证券化可能性改变的情况下,贷方会在信用评分截止时改变其筛选。因此,信用评分截止规则不能用来了解证券化对承销的道德风险影响。通过证明这一证据已被误解,我们的分析应使人们相信证券化导致审查不严的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号