首页> 外文期刊>Journal of modern African studies >The pitfalls of power sharing in a new democracy: the case of the National Party in South Africa
【24h】

The pitfalls of power sharing in a new democracy: the case of the National Party in South Africa

机译:新民主主义中权力分享的陷阱:南非国家党的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A key political feature of South Africa's transformation was the African National Congress, the National Party and Inkatha Freedom Party working together in a grand coalition. This arrangement was praised by leading power-sharing theorist Arend Lijphart. The unity government began in 1994 but two years later the National Party withdrew. This article explores power sharing during the initial phase of the settlement and discusses three aspects of it. First, the South African example points to the electoral drawbacks of power sharing for minor parties. Second, the National Party's participation in the coalition stifled the early development of substantial political opposition which slowed the pace of democratic consolidation. Third, participation in a power-sharing arrangement undermined the National Party's electoral fortunes contributing to its dissolution in 2005. This was an unexpected outcome for a party which had co-authored the country's settlement a little over a decade earlier.
机译:南非转型的一个关键政治特征是非洲全国大会,国家党和墨岳自由党在大联盟中共同努力。这种安排受到领先的电力共享理论家arend lijphart的赞扬。统一政府于1994年开始,但两年后,国家党退出。本文探讨了在结算初始阶段的权力共享,并讨论了它的三个方面。首先,南非的例子指出了小方的权力分配的选举缺点。其次,国家党的参与联盟扼杀了大量政治反对派的早期发展,减缓了民主合并的步伐。第三,参与权力分享安排破坏了国家党的选举家,在2005年促成了其解散的贡献。这是一方的意想不到的成果,该党在十年上曾在十年过几十年中撰写了一会儿的结算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号