首页> 外文期刊>Journal of mixed methods research >Relationships Between Quantitative Measures of Evaluation Plan and Program Model Quality and a Qualitative Measure of Participant Perceptions of an Evaluation Capacity Building Approach
【24h】

Relationships Between Quantitative Measures of Evaluation Plan and Program Model Quality and a Qualitative Measure of Participant Perceptions of an Evaluation Capacity Building Approach

机译:评估计划的量化措施与计划模型质量之间的关系以及评估能力建设方法的参与者感知的定性度量之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite a heightened emphasis on building evaluation capacity and evaluation quality, there is a lack of tools available to identify high-quality evaluation. In the context of testing the Systems Evaluation Protocol (SEP), quantitative rubrics were designed and tested to assess the quality of evaluation plans and models. Interview data were also collected and analyzed using a priori codes. A mixed methods approach was used to synthesize quantitative and qualitative data and explore trends. Consistencies between data types were found for attitude and capacity, and disconnects were found for knowledge, cyberinfrastructure, time, and quality. This approach to data integration represents a novel way to tap the generative potential of divergence that arises when different methods produce contradictory results.
机译:尽管高度重视建设评估能力和评估质量,但仍缺乏可用于识别高质量评估的工具。在测试系统评估协议(SEP)的背景下,设计并测试了定量指标,以评估评估计划和模型的质量。采访数据也被收集并使用先验代码进行分析。混合方法用于合成定量和定性数据并探索趋势。数据类型之间的一致性在态度和能力上找到了,而在知识,网络基础设施,时间和质量上也发现了脱节。这种数据集成方法代表了一种新颖的方法,可以挖掘不同方法产生矛盾结果时产生的发散潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号