首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Media Economics >Are News Media Substitutes? Gratifications, Contents, and Uses
【24h】

Are News Media Substitutes? Gratifications, Contents, and Uses

机译:是新闻媒体的替代品吗?满足,内容和用途

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Internet is generally expected to have one of two effects on traditional news media: It displaces them, or it forces them into distinct market niches. A shared assumption underlying both expectations is that news media displacement, or substitution, is a function of the degree to which news media are functional equivalents. This article explores this assumption from a niche theoretical perspective, using survey data from 2 student samples as illustrative cases. Findings indicate that, for these students, news media substitution does not depend on functional equivalence of media in providing gratifications and gratification opportunities or types of content. Post hoc analyses suggest instead that, for this particular audience, media use depends on habit and media accessibility. Follow-up studies should further investigate these relations for representative samples.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2011.601974
机译:通常,人们希望互联网对传统新闻媒体产生以下两种影响之一:取代互联网,或者迫使互联网进入不同的市场领域。两种期望都基于一个共同的假设,即新闻媒体的替代或替代是新闻媒体在功能上等同的程度的函数。本文从利基理论的角度探讨了这种假设,并使用了来自两个学生样本的调查数据作为例证。研究结果表明,对于这些学生而言,新闻媒体替代在提供满足感和满足感机会或内容类型方面并不取决于媒体的功能对等。相反,事后分析表明,对于这个特定的受众,媒体的使用取决于习惯和媒体的可访问性。后续研究应进一步调查这些代表性样品之间的关系。 digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2011.601974

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号