...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of materials in civil engineering >Shear Behavior of High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete versus Conventional Concrete
【24h】

Shear Behavior of High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete versus Conventional Concrete

机译:粉煤灰大体积混凝土与常规混凝土的抗剪性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The production of portland cement-the key ingredient in concrete-generates a significant amount of carbon dioxide. However, due to its incredible versatility, availability, and relatively low cost, concrete is the most consumed manufactured material on the planet. One method of reducing concrete's contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is the use of fly ash to replace a significant amount of the cement. An experimental investigation was conducted to study the shear strength of full-scale beams constructed with both high-volume fly ash concrete (HVFAC)-concrete with at least 50% of the cement replaced with fly ash-and conventional concrete (CC). This experimental program consisted of 16 beams (12 without shear reinforcing and four with shear reinforcing in the form of stirrups). Additionally, three different longitudinal-reinforcement ratios were evaluated within the test matrix. The beams were tested under a simply supported four-point loading condition. The experimental shear strengths of the beams were compared with the shear provisions of both American Concerte Institute Committee 318 and AASHTO LRFD Furthermore, statistical data analyses (both parametric and nonparametric) were performed to evaluate whether or not there is any statistically significant difference between the shear strength of the HVFAC and the CC beams. Results of these statistical tests show that the normalized shear capacity of the HVFAC is higher than the CC for the beams tested in this investigation.
机译:波特兰水泥(混凝土中的关键成分)的生产会产生大量的二氧化碳。但是,由于其多功能性,可用性和相对较低的成本,混凝土是地球上消耗最多的人造材料。减少混凝土对温室气体排放的影响的一种方法是使用粉煤灰代替大量的水泥。进行了实验研究,研究了用高体积粉煤灰混凝土(HVFAC)混凝土(至少50%的水泥被粉煤灰替代)和常规混凝土(CC)构造的全尺寸梁的抗剪强度。该实验程序由16根梁组成(12根不带剪力增强,四根带剪力的箍筋形式)。另外,在测试矩阵内评估了三种不同的纵向增强比。在简单支撑的四点载荷条件下对梁进行了测试。将梁的实验抗剪强度与美国协奏曲委员会318和AASHTO LRFD的抗剪强度进行了比较。此外,进行了统计数据分析(参数和非参数)以评估剪切之间是否存在统计学上的显着差异HVFAC和CC梁的强度。这些统计测试的结果表明,对于本研究中测试的梁,HVFAC的归一化剪切能力高于CC。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of materials in civil engineering》 |2013年第10期|1506-1513|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, 302 Engineering Research Lab, 500 W. 16th St., Rolla, MO 65409;

    Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, 331 Butler Carlton Hall, 1401 N. Pine St., Rolla, MO 65409;

    Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, 325 Butler Carlton Hall, 1401 N. Pine St., Rolla, MO 65409;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Hieh-volume fly ash concrete; Conventional concrete; Shear strength; Experimental study;

    机译:大量粉煤灰混凝土;常规混凝土;剪切强度;实验研究;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号