...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of material cycles and waste management >Evaluation of GIS‑based multi‑criteria decision‑making methods for sanitary landfill site selection: the case of Sivas city, Turkey
【24h】

Evaluation of GIS‑based multi‑criteria decision‑making methods for sanitary landfill site selection: the case of Sivas city, Turkey

机译:基于GIS的卫生垃圾填埋场选择的多标准决策方法评估:土耳其锡瓦斯市

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Landfill is the most common method used to eliminate municipal solid waste in developing countries. As in all developingresidential units, Sivas city is also encountering a major solid waste problem menacing both public health and environment.This study analyzes the 7 criteria (geological structure, land ability class, transportation, groundwater, surface water, residentialareas, and existing land use) utilized for solid waste landfill area preference reasons by employing some GeographicalInformation System (GIS) based, multi-criteria decision-making methods such as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) andSimple Additive Weighting (SAW). Evaluation of alternative areas defined by AHP and SAW methods is conducted withthe help of Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS). The study area was classified as “most suitable”, “suitable”,“averagely suitable”, “too little suitable” and “not suitable” in terms of their sanitary landfill properties. Accordingto AHP and SAW analyses results, it was determined that a large part of the study area (respectively, 46.82% and 27.81%)is within the category of “averagely suitable”. After the application based on GIS oriented multi-criteria decision-makinganalysis, 4 alternative places as solid waste disposal areas were recommended by taking environmental and physical factorsinto consideration. AHP–CODAS and SAW–CODAS methods were mutually utilized to rank these 4 areas according totheir suitability. As a result, “Area1” in integrated weights (AHP and SAW)–CODAS was selected as the most appropriateplace for sanitary permanent landfill.
机译:垃圾填埋是发展中国家消除城市固体废物的最常用方法。与所有发展中的居民单位一样,锡瓦斯市也遇到了严重危害公共卫生和环境的固体废物问题。本研究分析了7个标准(地质结构,土地能力等级,交通,地下水,地表水,居住区和现有土地利用) )由于采用某些基于地理信息系统(GIS)的多准则决策方法(例如层次分析法(AHP)和简单加法加权(SAW))而用于固体垃圾填埋场的优先考虑。在基于距离的组合评估(CODAS)的帮助下,进行了AHP和SAW方法定义的替代区域的评估。根据其卫生垃圾填埋场的性质,研究区域被分类为“最合适”,“合适”,“一般合适”,“太不合适”和“不合适”。根据AHP和SAW的分析结果,可以确定研究区域的很大一部分(分别为46.82%和27.81%)属于“一般适用”类别。在基于GIS的多准则决策分析方法应用后,考虑到环境和物理因素,推荐了4个替代场所作为固体废物处置区。分别使用AHP-CODAS和SAW-CODAS方法对这4个领域进行了排名。结果,综合权重(AHP和SAW)– CODAS的“ Area1”被选为最适合永久性卫生填埋场的地方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号