首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management >Managerial Discretion: An Empirical Review and Focus on Future Research Directions
【24h】

Managerial Discretion: An Empirical Review and Focus on Future Research Directions

机译:管理上的自由裁量权:实证性考察并着眼于未来的研究方向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Scholars have long been interested in when and to what degree managers are able to exert control over their organizations. In this review, we examine managerial discretion, or the latitude of action available to managers. Since its introduction, scholars have attempted to explain when managers will have discretion, what discretion means for organizational outcomes, and how discretion may differentially influence organizational outcomes when it enables or constrains leaders. Our review indicates that while a significant number of studies have examined discretion, few have attempted to validate the prescriptions of the managerial discretion construct. Furthermore, studies to date have primarily focused on the industry task environment as a measure of discretion, with less attention focused on the manager's characteristics and the internal organization. We then assess construct validity and the measurement of managerial discretion, offering recommendations to future researchers for improving the operationalization of this construct. Finally, we consider how discretion forces may interact as either complements or substitutes and how such interactions may have both organizational- and individual-level consequences.
机译:长期以来,学者们对管理者何时,在何种程度上能够对其组织施加控制感兴趣。在这篇评论中,我们研究了管理者的自由裁量权,或管理者可以采取的行动范围。自引入以来,学者们一直试图解释经理何时将具有酌处权,酌处权对组织成果有何意义,以及酌情权如何在对领导者有利或不利的情况下对组织成果产生不同的影响。我们的评论表明,尽管有大量研究检查了自由裁量权,但很少有人尝试验证管理自由裁量权结构的处方。此外,迄今为止的研究主要集中在行业任务环境上,以作为判断的标准,而较少关注的是管理者的特征和内部组织。然后,我们评估架构的有效性和管理自由度的度量,向未来的研究人员提供建议,以改善该架构的可操作性。最后,我们考虑自由裁量力如何作为补充或替代相互作用,以及这种相互作用如何在组织和个人层面产生后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号