首页> 外文期刊>Journal of management education >Let's Burn Them All: Reflections on the Learning-Inhibitory Nature of Introduction to Management and Introduction to Organizational Behavior Textbooks
【24h】

Let's Burn Them All: Reflections on the Learning-Inhibitory Nature of Introduction to Management and Introduction to Organizational Behavior Textbooks

机译:让我们全力以赴:对管理概论和组织行为学概论的学习抑制性的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This essay provides evidence from the neurosciences that standard Introduction to Management and Introduction to Organizational Behavior textbooks may inhibit, rather than facilitate, learning of the basic concepts and the rudimentary knowledge-basis that underlie the complex skills business students should learn in subsequent coursework and that they must hone in practice as future managers. Specific introductory textbook limitations that are addressed include the following: (a) the nearly total absence of neuroscience findings that have important relevance and application to management and organizational behavior; (b) the ineffective manner in which theories are presented; (c) the use of idiosyncratic, academically derived, or simply spot-invented language; (d) the nonengaging manner in which information (generally speaking) is presented; and (e) the question of whether such textbooks are being read, much less studied. Based on my recent, joyous experience in not using such textbooks, I propose, for readers' possible consideration, an alternative (hyperlink) practice that is (a) fully compatible with recent neuroscience research on management, learning, and information retention/retrieval and (b) likely to dramatically increase student engagement with assigned readings in Introduction to Management and Introduction to Organizational Behavior courses and their ability to retrieve content and apply it during class discussions.
机译:本文提供了来自神经科学的证据,证明标准的《管理入门》和《组织行为导论》教科书可能抑制而不是促进学习基本概念和基本知识基础,而基础知识和基本知识基础是企业在随后的课程中应该学习的复杂技能的基础,以及他们必须在实践中成为未来的经理。解决的具体介绍性教科书局限性包括:(a)几乎完全没有神经科学发现,这些发现与管理和组织行为具有重要的关联和适用性; (b)提出理论的方式无效; (c)使用特有的,学术派生的或仅是现场发明的语言; (d)以非接触方式呈现信息(通常而言); (e)是否正在阅读这类教科书的问题,研究较少。基于我最近不使用此类教科书的愉快经历,我建议一种替代的(超链接)做法,以供读者考虑,该做法(a)与最近关于管理,学习和信息保留/检索和(b)通过“管理概论”和“组织行为概论”课程中指定的阅读内容以及他们在课堂讨论中检索内容并将其应用的能力,可能显着提高学生的参与度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号