首页> 外文期刊>Journal of macromarketing >Distributive Justice: Pressing Questions, Emerging Directions, and the Promise of Rawlsian Analysis
【24h】

Distributive Justice: Pressing Questions, Emerging Directions, and the Promise of Rawlsian Analysis

机译:分配正义:紧迫的问题,新出现的方向和罗尔斯分析的承诺

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the years, the concept of distributive justice (DJ) has consistently been defined as addressing how a community treats its members in terms of the assignments of benefits and burdens according to some standard of fairness (Johnson 1956; Jackson 2005). Unlike other aggregate concepts used in social economics and macromarketing (e.g., Quality of Life or living wage) that have dynamically shifted definitions depending on time and place, our understanding of the core meaning of DJ has remained remarkably stable. Despite the definitional stability, as we learn below, this situation does not mean that arriving at a consensus about whether DJ has been attained in specific business situations is simplistic or uncontroversial. Indeed, as we shall see, quite the opposite seems to be the case.
机译:多年来,分配正义(DJ)的概念一直被定义为解决社区如何根据某些公平标准按照利益和负担的分配来对待其成员(Johnson 1956; Jackson 2005)。与社会经济学和宏观营销中使用的其他总体概念(例如生活质量或生活工资)不同,其定义会根据时间和地点而动态变化,我们对DJ核心含义的理解仍然非常稳定。尽管有定义上的稳定性(如下文所述),但这种情况并不意味着就在特定业务情况下是否获得DJ达成共识是简单或无争议的。确实,正如我们将要看到的,情况恰恰相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号