...
【24h】

Impact of Judicial Overreach on PPP Construction Projects

机译:司法超标对PPP建设项目的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There are instances of judicial overreach, although infrequently, practiced by courts. This results in time delay as well as handing over of public services beyond the scheduled date, fallout of the impact suffered by public-private partnership (PPP) projects. Taking such time until resolution of disputes owing to adjudication by different courts leads to prolongation of completion of the project. To this end, the merits of intermediate orders, injunctions, and final judgment pronounced by the different courts (hierarchically) are presented by way of an in-depth analysis of a specific case. Lessons learned from the experiences, such as (1) ensuring time-bound enforcement of the clauses of the contract, (2) comprehensive, adequate, and unambiguous drafting of the contract, and (3) avoiding nonadherence to the timeline schedule for fulfilling the obligations by parties to the contract and as stipulated in the concession agreements (CA), have been deduced for future applications. It also needs attention of legal policymakers who must ensure that courts are strictly prohibited from venturing beyond their mandate. Further, a strict timeline for adjudication of cases in keeping with principles of natural justice may be legislated and put in place.
机译:尽管很少有司法上的司法伸张,但法院很少这样做。这导致时间延迟,以及超过预定日期的公共服务交接,公私伙伴关系(PPP)项目遭受的影响的后果。花费这样的时间直到由于不同法院的裁决解决争端会延长该项目的完成时间。为此,通过对特定案件的深入分析,介绍了不同法院(分层)宣布的中间命令,禁令和最终判决的优点。从经验中汲取的经验教训,例如(1)确保对合同条款进行有时限的执行;(2)全面,适当且明确地起草合同;以及(3)避免不遵守履行合同的时间表合同双方的义务和特许协议(CA)中规定的义务已被推算出来,以备将来使用。它还需要法律政策制定者的注意,他们必须确保严格禁止法院冒险超出其职权范围。此外,可以立法并制定一个严格的时间表,以根据自然正义原则审判案件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号