...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of law, economics, & organization >Screening in Courts: On the Joint Use of Negligence and Causation Standards
【24h】

Screening in Courts: On the Joint Use of Negligence and Causation Standards

机译:法院筛选:过失和因果标准的共同使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In legal systems all over the world, injurers are held liable only when the probability of having caused an accident exceeds a critical threshold (causation standard) and when behaving negligently. In a complete information framework, the joint use of the two instruments is puzzling as both whether a potential injurer has taken due care and whether he meets a specific causation standard depend only on his care level. We explain this puzzle with private information about injurers' avoidance costs, and we derive conditions under which the joint use of both instruments can induce self-selection of different cost types. With self-selection, low-cost firms take due care, whereas high-cost firms behave negligently, thereby aiming at escaping liability via the causation standard. Compared to the optimal single-instrument policy, we derive conditions under which such self-selection policies are strictly welfare-enhancing.
机译:在世界各地的法律体系中,仅当造成事故的可能性超过临界阈值(因果标准)并且行为失职时,伤害人才负有责任。在一个完整的信息框架中,这两种工具的共同使用令人困惑,因为潜在的伤害者是否已经得到应有的照顾以及他是否符合特定的因果标准仅取决于他的医疗水平。我们用有关伤害者回避成本的私人信息解释了这个难题,并得出了在两种工具联合使用下可以诱导不同成本类型进行自我选择的条件。通过自我选择,低成本公司会采取适当的措施,而高成本公司的行为会失职,从而旨在通过因果关系标准逃避责任。与最优的单一工具政策相比,我们得出了这样的条件,在这些条件下,这种自选政策严格地提高了福利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号