...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Latin American Studies >Sentencing The Social Question:court-made Labour Law In Cases Of Occupational Accidents In Argentina, 1900- 1915
【24h】

Sentencing The Social Question:court-made Labour Law In Cases Of Occupational Accidents In Argentina, 1900- 1915

机译:宣判社会问题:1900至1915年,阿根廷发生职业事故时法院制定的劳动法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article shows how Argentine judges effectively came to make labour law when ruling in occupational accident cases between 1900 and 1915. During this period, in the absence of a specific occupational accident law, a number of Argentine workers who had been victims of occupational accidents sued their employers for damages according to the Civil Code. By reinterpreting the principles of the Civil Code in these cases, Argentine judges attempted to accommodate aspects of a new social and economic reality to an increasingly outdated legal framework. The article argues that, in doing so, these judges articulated their own solution to one of the central issues of the time: the 'social question'. Furthermore, the article shows how the judiciary's particular solution to the social question effectively defined the kind of citizenship rights workers were able to claim in court.
机译:本文说明了阿根廷法官在处理1900年至1915年之间的职业事故案件时是如何有效地制定劳动法的。在此期间,由于没有特定的职业事故法,许多遭受职业事故受害者的阿根廷工人提起诉讼。根据《民法》要求其雇主赔偿损失。在这些情况下,阿根廷法官通过重新解释《民法典》的原则,试图使新的社会和经济现实的各个方面适应日益过时的法律框架。文章认为,通过这样做,这些法官明确表达了自己对当时的核心问题之一的解决方案:“社会问题”。此外,该文章还显示了司法机构对社会问题的特殊解决方案如何有效地定义了可以在法院提起诉讼的公民权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号