首页> 外文期刊>日本放射线技术学会杂志 >階層分析法とシミュレーションによるCRシステム導入の評価要因の検討
【24h】

階層分析法とシミュレーションによるCRシステム導入の評価要因の検討

机译:通过层次分析法和仿真检验CR系统引入的评价因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Medical institutions usually find it difficult to select computed radiography (CR) equipment because of the involvement of many complicated factors such as operability, processing time, and price. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is often applied in complex decision and evaluation situations. This study quantitatively evaluates the institution's selection criteria of equipment using AHP. The AHP model of this study consisted of 3 levels: the goal, 6 evaluations, and 3 alternatives. Processing time, price operability, picture quality, connectivity, and equipment size were considered as the criteria for decision marking. We simulated alteration of priority of evaluations by changing the weight of pricing between 0 and 1. Results showed that price and connectivity accounted for 60% of the total weight. On excluding operability, the difference in weight between equipment was 1.16 times; the priority of processing time was 1.36 times; and the priority of price was 1.37 times. In the same way, when considering operability, the difference in weight between equipment was 0.36 times, the priority of processing time was 0.45 times, and the priority of price was 0.11 times.%臨床の放射線科領域において画像診断機器は必須 である.しかし,画像診断機器は高価であり,機器 の選定にあたっては装置の性能や収益などの評価要 因が複雑に絡み合っており,導入基準や評価要因は 暖味といってもよいであろう.
机译:由于许多复杂因素(例如可操作性,处理时间和价格)的牵连,医疗机构通常发现很难选择计算机射线照相(CR)设备。层次分析法(AHP)通常用于复杂的决策和评估情况。这项研究定量评估了机构使用AHP的设备选择标准。这项研究的AHP模型包括3个层次:目标,6个评估和3个替代方案。处理时间,价格可操作性,图片质量,连接性和设备大小被视为决策标记的标准。我们通过在0和1之间更改定价权重来模拟评估优先级的变化。结果显示,价格和连接性占总权重的60%。在排除可操作性方面,设备之间的重量差为1.16倍;处理时间的优先级为1.36倍;价格的优先级是1.37倍。同样,在考虑可操作性时,设备之间的重量差为0.36倍,处理时间优先级为0.45倍,价格优先级为0.11倍。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号