...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Investment Compliance >Net trading, market making, and the SEC's view of best execution
【24h】

Net trading, market making, and the SEC's view of best execution

机译:净交易,做市以及美国证券交易委员会的最佳执行观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the implications of a recent SEC settlement with Morgan Stanley & Co. (MS & Co.) with regard to: communication and coordination among legal, compliance, business, and technology departments when designing, implementing, and maintaining operating systems and compliance policies and procedures; and the SEC's view of best execution in the context of net trading and market making. Design/methodology/approach – The paper describes the Settlement Order. Itdiscusses, in light of the Order, the need for firms to coordinate among departments when they implement new systems or make changes to new systems; and provides a legal and regulatory analysis of the basis for MS & Co.'s liability, including a brief history of regulations on best execution and riskless principal trading. It also offers principal lessons to be drawn. Findings – The Settlement Order found that MS & Co. would at times execute with the Street at a better price than it provided to a customer. The SEC noted that MS &Co. violated its duty of best execution in violation of the 1934 Exchange Act but particularly emphasized that the practice was inconsistent with MS & Co.'s established internal policies and procedures and certain disclosures provided by the firm to third-party broker-dealers from which it received orders. Practical implications – Broker-dealers need to clearly define their processes for implementing new systems or changing existing systems, including approval requirements, responsible individuals, and periodic review procedures to ensure adherence to stated policies and procedures. Broker-dealers need to disclose net trading practices or similar trading practices to other broker-dealers that are routing orders to them. They should also review their net trading practices in light of Regulation NMS. Originality/value – The paper provides practical guidance and review of regulations concerning net trading, riskless principal trading and best execution from experienced securities lawyers.
机译:目的–本文的目的是讨论与摩根士丹利公司(MS&Co.)最近的SEC和解对以下方面的影响:设计,实施过程中法务,法规,业务和技术部门之间的沟通与协调,并维护操作系统以及合规性政策和程序;以及SEC在网络交易和做市中实现最佳执行的观点。设计/方法/方法-本文描述了和解令。它根据命令讨论了企业在实施新系统或更改新系统时需要部门之间进行协调的问题;并提供MS&Co.责任基础的法律和法规分析,包括有关最佳执行和无风险本金交易法规的简要历史。它还提供了主要的经验教训。调查结果–和解令发现,MS&Co.有时会以比提供给客户的价格更好的价格在华尔街上执行。 SEC注意到MS&Co。违反了其最佳执行义务,违反了1934年《交易法》,但特别强调指出,这种做法与MS&Co.既定的内部政策和程序以及该公司向第三方经纪交易商提供的某些披露相抵触。收到订单。实际意义–经纪交易商需要明确定义其实施新系统或更改现有系统的过程,包括批准要求,负责任的人员和定期复查程序,以确保遵守既定的政策和程序。经纪交易商需要向正在路由订单的其他经纪交易商披露净交易惯例或类似交易惯例。他们还应根据NMS法规审查其净交易惯例。原创性/价值–该文件为有经验的证券律师提供了有关净交易,无风险本金交易和最佳执行的法规的实用指南和指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号